Posted on 03/03/2021 3:03:40 AM PST by SecAmndmt
“You’re trying to have it both ways, correct me if I am wrong, because you’re accepting the narrative that people a
re dying of cv19 in large numbers”
Where did I say that? No where did I suggest I was “accepting of” that idea.
“You’re trying to have it both ways, correct me if I am wrong, because you’re accepting the narrative that people a
re dying of cv19 in large numbers”
Where did I say that? No where did I suggest I was “accepting of” that idea.
“The only way to assess these vaccines is to do full long term double-blind placebo testing (and I mean a saline placebo, not some another vaccine), which cannot be done in 1 year.”
No debate.
“Hand waving away deaths and side effects is absolutely irresponsible.”
I did not do that.
The entire question I posed was NOT in regard to deaths as concerns any Covid-19 vaccine in general but was 100% on the lousy report claiming to identify something it did not, by the evidence, identify; because it conflated terms to imply things the evidence did not substantiate.
Like I said, there is nothing worse about a good premise than the use of false “evidence” to make the point.
The subject requires a massively better and more factual report than what was offered to start the thread.
“Where did I say that? No where did I suggest I was “accepting of” that idea.”
Well then there is no justification whatsoever for a vaccine.
The economic shutdown is political.
“The economic shutdown is political.”
Again, no argument there.
“The subject requires a massively better and more factual report than what was offered to start the thread.”
It is all we have.
Without the independent double-blind long-term testing, and a lot of subject data (which is what the people receiving the vaccines are: subjects), it will be impossible to assign injury to this particular vaccine.
It raises so many questions that I could write an essay on it. But I won’t.
If every one who got sick was treated PROMPTLY with ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine Protocol (Hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin [or doxycycline] plus zinc). or monoclonal antibodies, WE WOULDN”T NEED THE DAMN VACCINE.
Spirit of the Beast Pharmakia in high places.
They’re decending “as in the Days of Noah”
I got the first Pfizer vaccine shot in December and the second in January.
I’m still on two feet and breathing and I’m 64 years old.
**
“Without the independent double-blind long-term testing, and a lot of subject data (which is what the people receiving the vaccines are: subjects), it will be impossible to assign injury to this particular vaccine.”
O.K., but meanwhile, speculation and inferences are not a valid substitute.
If the vaccine is a binary bio weapon as many suspect, the vaccine push in Israel is Genocide.
“O.K., but meanwhile, speculation and inferences are not a valid substitute.”
You’re joking right?
We are being hit with wall to wall marketing and government push to take these vaccines. We’re being told that they are safe. They are not proven long term safe. At the same time the regulatory agencies are telling us that there are NO treatments or therapeutics. But there are treatments.
My position is that everyone should be questioning these vaccines and the campaign behind them. And people should be offered info about treatment protocols, because conventional medicine is typically agreeing with the regulatory agencies.
“My position is that everyone should be questioning these vaccines and the campaign behind them. And people should be offered info about treatment protocols, because conventional medicine is typically agreeing with the regulatory agencies.”
No disagreement.
But, but offering invalid “evidence” does not make that point. Untruths do not good arguments make.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.