Thank you. Which means the military would recognize this as a compromised DOJ.
Commander in Chief is not the same as the president. They're two different jobs. Now read this
https://whitehouse.gov1.info/continuity-plan/
The Commander in Chief Clause of Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.” Biden is President, ergo he is CIC.
The military would recognize DOJ taking its sweet time investigating a matter concerning the president’s son as requested by two senators as a “compromised DOJ”? Hello? It’s none of the military’s business. They do not sit in judgment over our various organs of government, nor do they stage coups and remove sitting presidents whenever some executive department is pokey or whatever. This is is the USA, not a military dictatorship like Burma or Sudan, thank God.
Your link: it is not the official White House website, but let’s assume it is accurate. From the page you linked:
**The 2007 “National Security Presidential Directive 51” directs the geographic dispersion of leadership, staff, and infrastructure in order to maintain the functions of the United States Government in the event the nation’s capital is “decapitated” by a terrorist attack.**
Seeing as how DC has not been decapitated by a terrorist attack, what does Directive 51 have to do with any of this?