Replies

Tell the asshat clown jesters and fools why they listening to their boy Fauci the garden gnome and not science?

Show a random controlled trial double face diapers work.

Already been tried, U.S. Marine Corps under MIL scrutiny and parameters. Didn’t do jack squat against virus:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717

Diogenesis to ransomnote

STOLEN ELECTION UPDATE

=========================

===> Judge Orders Election Do-Over after 78% of Mail-in Ballots Proved Fraudulent — Notary Arrested

===> New Information — FBI Took Possession of Suspicious Ballots in Georgia in Early January and Ordered Them Destroyed With a Shredder

***Already been tried, U.S. Marine Corps under MIL scrutiny and parameters. Didn’t do jack squat against virus:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717

____________________________________________________

Scanned the study. I didn’t find anywhere where they discussed or disclosed the number of cycles used for their PCR tests. IIRC, the 40-cycle standard was used, however it generates a number of false positives. The new standard is 30-35 cycles (I think).

In other words, their base data may be skewed.

“At the time of enrollment, 16 of 1847 participants (0.9%) tested by means of qPCR were positive for SARS-CoV-2; 5 of these participants also had positive IgG serologic results...” 16 qPCR vs. 5 IgG.

Note the number discrepancies between the qPCR test and the IgG test.

Thanks for that.
Yep. Double masked and still catching Covid.
Strange here under “Laboratory Methods”:

>>”At least two positive controls, eight negative controls (serum specimens obtained before July 2019), and four blanks (no serum) were included in every plate.”<<

I wonder why they had to go all the way back to before July 2019 for these (what type of serum specimens?)negative controls?
Was COVID here earlier than we knew? Not really sure what I am looking at but that before July 2019 seems troubling.

Looking at the supplementary appendix (linked to in the article) - They were doing SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing at least in December 2019 see page 9 in the PDF - document page 8 https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717/suppl_file/nejmoa2029717_appendix.pdf
further on page 12 - shows a table of Mutation Profile [Relative to Participant Data Wuhan Ref Genome]

Then there’s this: https://artic.network/ncov-2019 scroll to the end for the acknowledgments.

Hope someone can make sense of this.