Posted on 02/27/2021 11:39:55 PM PST by ransomnote
My last few posts are all from Anons, “over there”.
Isn’t the FBI interview form also called a 302?
Are there any comparison pictures of Trump and his supposed overweight body double?
I’m torn. That specific phraseology would seem to indicate that the massive fraud of 2020 is not going to be addressed, and we will all just have to grit our teeth and endure 4 years of Biden.
On the other hand, to do something like that is completely alien to Pres. Trump’s nature. To keep my sanity, I have to return to my comment of earlier today about Pompeo saying “the next 4 years are going to be tough”. It struck me as deliberate misdirection. (Never, ever publicly reveal your plans, especially when you know the enemy is watching every post on every board.)
Being called away from home unexpectedly, I wasn’t able to catch the speech live, so am going off of people’s comments here and on other boards. Will watch it on playback. However, I don’t think my assessment will change after watching it for myself. :-)
I’m a bit confused about something and searches have really served up nothing.
We know that the Supreme Court will not hear the Pennsylvania case. What about the other cases? I think there were a total of 7 in all, including Pennsylvania.
What about Georgia, Arizona? And of course, the cases brought by Sidney Powell and Lin Wood.
Did all these cases get dumped along with the PA case? Do we still have a chance in hell of having something, anything heard by the Supremes?
Thanks so much!
Another...
Notes from Donald J Trump CPAC Speech
Feb. 28, 2021
page 4
Womens sports are being destroyed by B policies
[missed a little here trying to post, lag problem]
Trump Economic comeback recap
USMCA
Second amendment was strongly supported.
No country comes close to competing with our comeback - military comeback too. Now we have best brand new equipment produced in USA.
Space Force was created. Dems want to promote socialism, leading to communism. That’s why some of our biggest supporters are from S America, because they know what happens.
Dems - unvarnished disdain for America, the legacy of our country - belief that our country is an exceptional nation, blessed by God. [But] We honor Lincoln, Jefferson, etc. And respect OUR GREAT AMERICAN FLAG.
[WE LOVE YOU! from crowd]
[Everyone is standing - continue to stand]
No one’s ever heard that chant before:
“It’s a great honor”
We believe in patriotic education & oppose the radical indoctrination of our youth”
We uphold Judeo-Chrisian values of our founding.
We embrace free thought, oppose political correctness. WE REJECT CANCEL CULTURE.
We affirm that the Constitution means what it says: AS WRITTEN.
We believe in law and order. We do not defund the police.
We believe in standing up to China - that America should dominate the future, not China.
ELECTION REFORM NEEDED
Big issue for Repubs - must have fair and honest elections.
Must act now. Go to legislatures. “This would have changed the outcome of the election at levels you wouldn’t believe.”
We can never let that happen again. We need election integrity/reform immediately. To give people confidence in the future of our country.
Electoral process is sick and corrupt. SCOTUS and other courts didn’t want to do anything about it.
[Crowd: YOU WON, YOU WON, YOU WON!]
SCOTUS didn’t have the courage to act
POTUS no standing? It’s my election and your election.
They should be ashamed for what they’ve done to our country, didn’t have the guts to make the right decision
Texas case - rejected
This is the most basic of all cheating - local courts changed the rules right before the election, a day or two
‘Today i wanna outline the steps we must take to change this:’’’
1. one election day
2. vote by mail - only for the sick or those outta the country. Eliminate mass mail in voting
3. mandatory voter id
they know it’s needed - con job
4. universal signature matching
5. verify citizenship
6. chain of custody protections for every ballot
7. No local judges or politicians changing rules must be done at state level
Ok now I’m confused. Trump said DonaldJTrump.com (unless my hearing is shot). I went there. But to contribute it’s still the same winred crap to donate.
So do you have another website that’s not winred?
ThankQ for the new thread, MqD !
The Highlander reporting in !
(Late; watched PDJT’s CPAC speech)
I listened live. I think your assessment is correct:
We’re in for 2 maybe 4 years of crap. I didn’t hear any magic words at all. Of course, why yell the enemy what is going to happen. Frankly, I’m not in a good mood right now.
Tell not yell. Sorry
They’ve already started...MSNBC headlines “Same old lies”...
I haven’t checked the rest...
My big boy.....jumping, chomping at the rope, & smiling. I’m happy.
“My last few posts are all from Anons, “over there”.”
(But #188 was mine.)
;-)
~Easy
NEW Q THREAD
FEB. 28, 2021
START AT #1
OKAY.
IF we win the ‘Mid-Terms ‘22, Trump may well run again.
Or, he will still have two more years to set up and roll out his choice of a worthy replacement.
Period.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
None of that works unless the government is cleaned out, election fraud addressed judiciary, DOJ, etc. Change must come long before then to allow his outlined steps (winning midterms in 2022) to happen. None of that will happen with Xiden in office.
President Trump isn’t the one who’s going to expose Xiden - I think that’s the military’s role (tribunals hearing election fraud, treason etc. because our courts are compromised)
Or maybe he meant the 302’s that have been missing re: Flynn.
Q post 302 just says For Green
There are!
I’ve seen them on Telegram, side-by-side comparisons. I save lots of pics, but that particular genre, I’ve not saved.
If I run into one, will post... if u are not already on Telegram,
I highly recommend it.
Into Aviation, watching closely for the TFR situation today.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WE NEED to hear from you about any of the
sky events’! Please stay with us!
Actually, I somewhat misquoted him, by omission. Went back to watch again, it was right before the end.
He said “...and then, a Republican president will *make a triumphant* return to the White House, and I wonder who that will be. I wonder who that will be?”
(He did say that last part twice, just then, the second time more softly than the first.)
Then there was a long pause, during which the crowd cheered and whistled, before he repeated, in a louder voice, “Who, who... who... will that be, I wonder?”
I got a strong “teasing” vibe from it. (Maybe it was just me? but I definitely did!)
If not Trump, it will be the person he endorses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.