To: MountainWalker; Kaslin; SunkenCiv; Liz; MHGinTN
Probably a good idea for any president let alone this senile unelected president. Seems like a huge risk for existence of the human race to depend upon the whims of one person. NO.
In case of conventional attack or nuclear attack (by the Soviet Union against NATO forces in Europe, or by China against Taiwan, or by Iran against Israel/UK/US/Europe, or North Korea against Korea-US forces) the military MUST HAVE the ability to respond immediately and effectively.
Delays (er, decisions) by committee WILL FAIL. HAVE ALWAYS FAILED.
You think Pelosi is capable of any more of a rational military response than AOC? Hell, Hillary (and the WH staff) had to drag Obama in off of the golf course to get “permission” to attack Bin Laden’s house in a single helicopter strike by one SEAL Team!
The exaggerated “all of humanity will die” canard is wrong as well.
56 posted on
02/25/2021 10:07:51 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
To: Robert A Cook PE
Nanzi would have to fire the missiles to see if the codes really worked....
67 posted on
02/25/2021 10:52:58 AM PST by
cgbg
(A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
To: Robert A Cook PE; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ...
89 posted on
02/27/2021 2:24:05 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson