I could add that events might unfold that make Q Anon seem more credible than it likely seems to many right now, but that would be more of a lucky guess than an insider’s foreknowledge of a plan of action, just as if I said, I bet Jesus Christ will return to the earth in March and solve all these problems, and in fact He did, then I would have made a lucky guess since I have no actual knowledge of that possible outcome other than reading in the Bible about a very similar world into which Jesus Christ makes a second appearance on earth. I think Q Anon is sort of like that kind of thinking, it is based on something but not the kind of insider knowledge that would guarantee it was onto something.
The danger with both concepts (trust the plan and the second coming) is that if you sit around waiting because somebody else has things covered, and that’s not the case, then your own potential efforts are not placed into operation. I think that’s the down side of Q Anon and “trust the plan,” and whoever started it bears responsibility if the plan we are asked to trust does not actually exist. Lucky break for them if it does exist outside of their sphere of knowledge. You’re on firmer ground with second coming predictions if you leave out a specific date, that’s something we have been reliably informed will happen although nobody knows when.
My response to supporters of Q Anon is along these lines, we have tolerated it for quite a while and want to believe that somebody somewhere has a plan, but there’s a natural tendency in these urgent times to ask this question — is there really any foundation to Q Anon or is it merely wishful thinking combined with some facts of interest, I am not “opposed to Q Anon” but opposed to waiting around for some non-existent option to be activated.