There are some exaggerations in the claims by the authors.
Are vaccines “unsafe:? Yes, according to the authors.
However, even in the documents it is clear that there are no more unsafe than are all drugs to some degree, with known and as yet “possible” unknown side effects of ANY drug, and difficulties in knowing every particular individuals potential degree of experiencing or not experiencing different side effects on any drug. If the exaggeration of the authors were to be accepted, then no one should take any medical drugs for the same “unsafe” reason the authors say not to take vaccines.
The best answers are the “we don’t know” anwers, but are they sufficient to say ALL vaccines are bad.
The most relevant question asked really should be the main topic and should be supported:
“The authorities have never systematically and broadly compared the long-term health of the vaccine-free who have caught these infections versus the health of those who have been vaccinated for the diseases.”
Such a study would help resolve a question among the current Wuhan Virus concerns - who has and will keep more vital antibody responses to the Wuhan Virus - those who got an infection from it and defeated it one way or another, or those who get a vaccine?
I think there is a false narrative by “the powers that be” that does not give sufficient credit in protecting the community to those who got the virus and defeated it without a vaccine.
So, will this Control Group” survey spawn any equal survey and analysis by anyone else, or will the powers that be try to “ghost bury” it.
The difference between vaccines and those other drugs: vaccines carry the aura of being “mandatory”. But no public health authority or pediatrician will tell you that vaccines are optional.