To: tbw2
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), SCOTUS allowed compulsory vaccination, and affirmed it in Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174 (1922). When the practice of personal liberty inherently puts others liberty at risk, the state has the right to act to protect the liberty of everyone. Not to be naive, people being people means how to make this decision, on what basis, is usually a hard fought political battle. Looking at the history of the case, in the 1900 to 1920, communicable diseases were a leading cause of death. Before the 1918 flu smallpox was extremely dangerous. Vaccines were a solution that worked. There were risks, however these were less than not vaccinating.
This brings up two problems with libertarianism. Libertarians are so focused on the individual, they forget the individual is a part of a society, and everyone in society has rights too. When the liberty or rights of one transgress on the liberty and rights of someone else, in the U.S. and other countries legislatures pass laws and courts make decisions to deal with that. Second, libertarians tend to ignore how we got to where we are when it gets in their way, then act as if a philosophical argument makes all that history go away.
3 posted on
02/22/2021 11:44:35 PM PST by
Widget Jr
To: Widget Jr
so iety on one hand cannot hold contradictory beliefs of ‘my body my choice’ for one thing and “we will force you to take this’ for others
besides forced vaccination (any medical procedure) against a persons will is a clear violation of the Nuremburg laws
you really want to be a nazi?
4 posted on
02/23/2021 12:00:33 AM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Widget Jr
When the practice of personal liberty inherently puts others liberty at risk, the state has the right to act to protect the liberty of everyone. Which is not humanly possible.
You cannot protect the liberty of everyone with state intervention.
The minute the state steps in, someone’s liberty is going to be trampled for the alleged sake of someone else’s liberty and usually it’s the liberty of the vast majority to accommodate the preferences of a small minority.
5 posted on
02/23/2021 1:13:06 AM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Widget Jr
SPJNK. Like anyone who tries to force a needle into me.
7 posted on
02/23/2021 4:02:49 AM PST by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
To: Widget Jr
And it’s not solely for philosophical reasons. But health reasons. If YOU want to protect yourself against the virus, then YOU get vaccinated.....simple. I’ll take my chances.
8 posted on
02/23/2021 4:06:34 AM PST by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
To: Widget Jr
You need to move to Germany with that philosophy. 😆
9 posted on
02/23/2021 7:50:34 AM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Widget Jr
So you voted for Clinton and live in Seattle. OK now we get it. 😆
10 posted on
02/23/2021 7:52:18 AM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson