No - you’re putting words in my mouth to defend your hyperbolic defense of an untested genetic technology.
My response was to the fact that they’re delaying mammograms because of the adverse reactions.
Something they’ve NEVER done in decades of traditional flu vaccines.
One medical practice in one place is recommending that certain women delay routine screening mammograms for a few weeks in order to reduce false positives.
Who’s jumping to hyperbole here?
It even says right in the article that inflammatory response is completely normal after vaccination. They’re simply seeing a higher rate of lymph node swelling after a particular vaccine. They’re not concerned by it. They’re not telling people it’s bad (it isn’t). And they aren’t telling women who have a risk factor (like finding a lump) to delay at all.
They’re simply suggesting that certain women hold off a few weeks to reduce false positives. In response, you’re making claims about how this is some kind of wild and crazy unprecedented response that must indicate some major problem. Does it get more difficult to maintain that narrative as hundreds of millions of people around the world get vaccinated without a problem?