Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: precisionshootist

I understand the process as you have defined it, and I disagree with your assessment.

We are merely discussing theory. The only time this has been actually tried, the result was a completely new constitution irrespective of what the old one stated.

‘A republic, if you can keep it.’

Be warned and beware.


214 posted on 02/21/2021 7:34:13 PM PST by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: beancounter13
"I understand the process as you have defined it, and I disagree with your assessment. We are merely discussing theory. The only time this has been actually tried, the result was a completely new constitution irrespective of what the old one stated. ‘A republic, if you can keep it.’ Be warned and beware."

Then explain this statement.

"Anything can happen when you put a bunch of people in a room when each of them believes that they have the power of the people and no underlying limits on their power."

What is it you think can happen that gives you concern? What power do you think these people in a room have?

You understand that the option to call an article V convention was added as a PROTECTION to the peoples right to change their government. It's there in the event the people want to change things but the government refuses to do so. Lastly, if adding the article five convention option could easily put our republic in danger why would the founders have added it?

218 posted on 02/21/2021 7:52:39 PM PST by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson