You Qballs are an embarrassment to this forum.
L
>You Qballs are an embarrassment to this forum.
The strawman ‘technique’ of claiming that anything but anti-something is that something is a favorite of leftists (e.g. if you’re not “anti-racist” you’re a racist). Not impressed.
For the record, even though I don’t fit the category of ‘believing in Q’: I have read Q drops non-dismissively — quite a few of the ‘drops’ are insightful, and the lefty people who are most on the side of wrong seem very frightened of Q. I am very wary of secondary ‘interpreters’ of Q stuff (e.g. Praying Medic); and I think a lot of the things people mock about the Q thing come from those guys. Some, such as ‘trust the plan’ and ‘enjoy the show’ come from the Q moniker.
My best guess as to what that all was (is?) is a group somewhere in the alphabet agency soup that attempted to a) popularize/make known some of the bad actors on the planet; and b) possibly effect a paradigm shift where those persons/organizations lost influence.
I think they overreached in confidence and goals and/or underestimated the reach of the existing powers, and got their tails handed to them. (case in point: if I’d written 6 months ago that most of the GOP in DC, key ‘Republican’ governors and officials, and the supposedly 6-3 ‘conservative USSC would tacitly support blatant in-your-face election fraud, anyone would’ve thought me loopy).
As to my comment above about threads:
Someone mailed me: “what are Q-thread rules?”
I’m failing search to find the original admonition at the moment but I was under the impression the “Q thread” exists because people were strongly requested to keep Q stuff in one thread per day.
(The search turned up tons of exceptions to this rule, so whatever? Still if one wanted to ask Q “fans” something you’d think you’d ask it where they are rather than in a new vanity?)