Replies

You may be confusing “chosen to run” with “chosen to serve”. President Trump wasn’t “installed”. He was persuaded to run but he still had to do the hard work required to get the people to vote for him. It’s not inconsistent that being asked by the military to run per drop 14 and the information provided in drops 2553 and 4812 can all be true at the same time.

The military has been the one constant through the decades since the deep state really started to change the direction the country was going. It’s logical that they would know the long-term plans of the DS and begin to devise a plan to permanently thwart them. They report only to the CIC so having the right CIC was critical to saving the Republic. That’s why Admiral Rogers went to TT. Candidate Trump was deemed to be the right person and the military stopped the vote fraud in 2016 in the swing states so Trump could win his first term and begin the cleanup.

Further, if this was only about President Trump serving a second term with no long term changes, they would have just stopped the overseas vote fraud as they did in 2016 and PDJT would be 33 days into his second term. There’s more going on than we can see and those who’ve watched it through the decades are determined to clean it up.

And I thank you for this exchange, CDY. You’ve inadvertently stiffened my backbone.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Good post.
I went looking for a Q drop that referenced Plan Z. It’s no longer there (they changed some). I believe it said that the country had fallen under foreign persuasion and the military wanted to avoid enacting a military coup (Plan Z) and President Trump was the solution. I don’t know the wording or how much of that interpretation was derived vs. stated or if it was analyzed in combination with any other drops. I do recall “Plan Z’ and can’t find it now in Q drops.

I wish I could recall more of it but basically if they couldn’t find someone willing to serve, the only other option was a Military Coup.

I also recall reading an analysis on 8ch that demonstrated, as far as election statistics can be interpreted, that cheating was interrupted in just enough precincts/locations to allow actual votes to ‘take hold’ and cause the true winner to, you know, as is the habit in free countries, WIN!

And that night I enjoyed watching Hillary’s lackey (forget his name), sitting outside the convention hall in the dark, struggling with tears and shock because she wasn’t supposed to lose. They’d stolen the election fair and square; how could this happen? Good times...good times...

All actions I’ve seen on the part of Q/POTUS are attempts to preserve/restore the rule of law; that’s why we wait wait wait wait wait....upon the rule of law. *sigh*

I also believe it’s why Q is sometimes silent at critical points (to us, anyway) involving the public’s response to oppressive actions. Q/POTUS do not WANT to do the same thing the CIA does (fan public sentiment to achieve goals). Q/Q+ do say Get Loud, Be Heard - but they don’t direct our opinions or tell us what to say. They do know we’ll be ignored, but that’s part of the waking up process for both us and the officials who abuse us.

There was a time approaching Jan 20 wherein ‘rumor’ went around that the President was faced with a difficult decision - Scavino tweets portrayed him as pensive (around the time he was photographed looking at a portrait of Lincoln). Christians were asking for prayer for him.

I wonder if it was the weighty decision to allow the fake farce to take office and wait upon the Supreme Court to fail us, or to cut to the chase (insurrection act/Martial Law) and face the increased risk of Civil War? Running the cost/benefit analyses over and over, trying to determine which course of action protects the public and preserves the republic best.