[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

One of the biggest causes of this issue is that China has spread money around on BOTH sides of the aisle.

In fact, most of the incidences of RHINOS shiving Trump that I am aware of, the perps can be tied to Chinese $$.

[Olog-hai]

Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

— Communist Goal #15

Franklin Roosevelt’s rapid conversion from Constitutionalism to the doctrine of unlimited government is an oft-told story. But I am here concerned not so much by the abandonment of states’ rights by the national Democratic Party — an event that occurred some years ago when that party was captured by the socialist ideologues in and about the labor movement — as by the unmistakable tendency of the Republican Party to adopt the same course. […] Thus, the cornerstone of the Republic, our chief bulwark against the encroachment (on) individual freedom by Big Government, is fast disappearing under the piling sands of absolutism.

The Republican Party, to be sure, gives lip service to states’ rights. We often talk about “returning to the states their rightful powers”; the Administration has even gone so far as to sponsor a federal-state conference on the problem. But deeds are what count, and I regret to say that in actual practice, the Republican Party, like the Democratic Party, summons the coercive power of the federal government whenever national leaders conclude that the states are not performing satisfactorily. …

— The Conscience of a Conservative (1960), pp. 24-25

It is more ideology than money.

After all, how did Red China get its money to begin with? What member(s) of which “party” opened things up to this communist state?

There is no “both sides of the aisle”—there is only the Uniparty, and they have existed for decades.