Maybe it was the offspring from their union with women that built them.
Posted on 02/20/2021 8:55:43 AM PST by patriot torch
What do fallen angels and stonehenge have in common?
Perhaps many are not aware but approx. 1,000 years prior to the flood, fallen angels bred with women and created a breed of giants. (See chapter 6 of Genesis)
The breed that was created is known as Nephilim.
It is presented as a possibility that fallen angels & Nephilim were involved in the creation of these designs in times past.
Many have heard of the famous Stonehenge in England, but not many are aware that there is a similar creation here in the U.S. in New Hampshire.
What is really interesting is the links made between various Biblical locations as well as various secular creations such as Stonehenge.
The video is less than 30 minutes and it may surprise you what is presented.
Maybe it was the male fallen angels that built the Egyptian pyramids too.........
.
Name a single female angel.
All angels were created at one time and all are the same age. A third threw in their lot with lucifer when he rebelled and this resulted in fallen angels. Chapter 6 illustrates their empowerment over weakened human beings.
The only one who comes to mind is Mildred but for some reason biblical historians never mention her.........
But I refer back to my original statement, why were the so called "fallen angels" only males? Aren't males the only species that can mate with females? (I'm referring to your statement that the fallen angels were breeding with women)
I’ll post the following text from my study Bible...(Genesis 6:2)
Genesis 6:2
2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
(The “Sons of God” portrayed here refer to fallen angels, which had thrown in their lot with lucifer, who led a revolution against God some time in eternity past; in order to spoil the human lineage through which the Messiah would eventually come, they would seek to corrupt that lineage, and would do so by marrying the “daughters of men,” therby producing a mongrel race, so to speak, of which at least some of these offspring turned out to be “giants”; at any rate, all who were the result of such a union were tainted; the term “sons of God” in the Old Testement, at least as it is used here, is never used of human beings, but always of angels, whether righteos or fallen [Job 1:6; 2:1]; in his short Epistle, Jude mentions these particular “angels”. He said that they “kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation”, he then said what their sin was: “going after strange flesh.” Concerning this, Jude also said that God “has reserved [them] in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgement of the great day” [Jude, vss. 6-7]).
Followed by
Genesis 6:3-6
King James Version
3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6 And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
Yes.
If Pangaea was a thing the slow division happened during the life of Peleg (and perhaps continued a short time after he died as well, IMO) after the flood happened.
How far could a giant (or a group of giants {Rephaim, Emim and Zamzummim}) walk in a day?
Were they already in "America" when the earth was divided?
Just something to think about. I know I have.
Of course, you'll be told by mainstream "thought" that the division of continents took thousands of years to finish and happened millions of years ago so tread carefully.
The purpose of the creation of angels was not to procreate, hence, only males. If the “purpose” was to procreate then he would have created angels both male and female.
Suggesting (on my part) that God did not create the angels to procreate does not exclude their ability to procreate with women. Nor, admittedly does it suggest they were able. The only point of reference we have to understanding is the Word of God. Which isn’t always easily understood on such complex issues.
At the very least, we can suggest with Biblical reference, that evil spirits (derived from fallen angels) have the ability to dwell in man. (Albeit the unsaved mankind)
Given that link, it would not be a far jump to acknowledge men, posessed by demons, had inpregnated women.
Just a thought.
Best movie ever!
“I guess the only remaining question is, are we doing Stonehenge tonight?”
And only the ignorant claim the children of Israel built the pyramids.
Maybe it was the offspring from their union with women that built them.
Interesting. Because I was just wondering about that because of David and Goliath for instance which was after the flood. So the question is, what was the decendency of Goliath if the lineage was destroyed by the flood.
Again, since this area is unfamilar to me, I consult my study Bible.
Genesis 6:4
Thete were giants in the Earth in those days (as a result of the union of the fallen angels with the “daughters of men”); and also after that (”those days” speak of the time before the flood, while “also after that” speaks of the time after the flood; in fact, Goliath, who was killed by David, was one of those specimens), when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown (these terms, “mighty men, men of renown” shoot down the hypothesis of these terms referring merely to the lineage of Seth and the lineage of Cain).
Search “Pillar of Enoch Pyramid”
Again from study notes-
Genesis 10:25 (just the study notes)
(Shem was in the lineage of the Promised Seed, so out of Shemultimatly sprang Jesus, the Plant of Renown [Ezek. 34:29; Lk. 3:36]. The Earth being divided in the days of Peleg refers to the time of the Tower of Babel, and the confusion of the languages by God. The name “peleg” means “division.” It refers here to language being divided, rather then land being divided.)
That has always been my thought, minus another infestation. Of course, sin itself remained after the flood. I find it impossible however to believe that the “giant” mutation lineage would carry through Seth, being the lineage of Jesus. So it would be interesting to know the decendency of Goliath.
Good point. But this was also thousands of years ago. Would the solstice alone without navigation tools be that precise? And there is also the question of mechanicle ability to move and place the stones.
So the stonehenge is actually an advanced version of a sundial. Which was used (in my understanding) as a means of pagan sun worshipping. But again, given the time reference, it was pretty advanced knowledge.
I’ve also heard that there is an inscription on the well known stone hedge (regarding population) to 500 million. And I’ve heard some link this to the illuminati and new world order references. Bill Gates being perhaps at the center.
Genesis 11
5 And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
6 And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
8 So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
9 Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.
It seems to me that you're trying to force something to your liking, not to what the Bible says.
Again, believe as you will. I will post to you no more about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.