But nothing. Force is always to be condemned. Got it.
The "peaceful resolution of political conflict," like voting last November? I don't hear GG condemning what was introduced into that. Or even "lamenting" it.
He's got a whole lot to say about Julian Assange, not so much about a stolen US election.
Just another pearl clutcher swooning about January 6.
I was wondering about those very same lines in Greenwald’s article. I can only imagine how he would have written about those political conflicts of the last quarter of the 18th Century between the colonists and those powdered-wig wearing redcoat guys.