Sounding oh so reasonable - another place, another time
just wow
well i aint too good at figuring %’s or whatever- but if say 90% of elderly die, and say 10 in 100 died before getting vaccine, just for sake of simplicity- a 90% reduction would mean only 1 in 100 would now die supposedly, if they get vaccine?
As it is, in the elderly, 99.4% survive i guess already- so the remaining % deaths would be reduced a further 92% according to the article So we’re nearing a 100$ survival rate even with hte elderly/sick
or am i figuring it wrong?