Replies

So, reviewing your citation of purported evidence. From a weekly newsletter, First off I notice his unbiased name calling attacking American Frontline Doctors member, Lee Merritt, (an American orthopedic surgeon) and labeling him as a “bumbling neophyte” and what was that criticism you just launched against a FR member being sarcastic?

And to narrow down on your personal attacks directed towards Dr. Stella Immanuel, she suggests that dna manipulation may be involved with the vaccine creation. And I cite:

“DNA is being used in medical treatments and that researchers are working on a vaccine to prevent people from becoming religious. She also believes in a conspiracy by the “Illuminati” to destroy the world with abortion, gay marriage, and of all things, children’s toys.”

I would not rule that out. Can you?

As for your demons claim, he (the author of the newsletter goes on to state,

“As far as gynecological diseases go, they can be caused by having sex with witches and demons that appear in dreams.”

So is this added inuendo enhancing her words or exact quote? And even if it is, thats one doctor of ( ) a far stretch from the way in which you attempt to cast this net upon the entire membership.

And now onto your perceived wide reaching accusations that several (emphasis added) AFD’s have been arrested. Concerning one member, Dr. Simone Gold, yes, she was arrested. On January 6 at the Capital. (Are you attempting to suggest all who were arrested were somehow deserving of ridicule and slanderous statements? Perhaps some were political targets. The author of this hit piece suggests she was part of an “attack” is that your charge as well?

Continuing to quote:

“She has a sordid history of attacking Dr. Fauci’s sound scientific advice and claiming that COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental biological agents.”

So is she “sordid” for calling into question the ethics and integrity of a disgraced known liar named dr. Fauci? Even you refused to stand behind his character in a previous thread. Many would support her claims that these vaccines are indeed, “experimental biological agents” whats to disagree?

Continuing....

“She warns people not to be “coerced” into taking them. Lockdowns, this guru.....”

Again, I must interject to point out his name calling, but I digress...

“Lockdowns, this guru maintains, have mental health effects that are more harmful than those caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus...”

And this is disputable??? Really?

“which according to her, are minimal. Dr. Gold trots out the usual nonsensical trope about 99% of infections by the virus being harmless. While it is true that most infected people experience mild or moderate symptoms, roughly 10-15% progress to serious disease and about 5% become critically ill. In some cases, symptoms can linger for months, maybe even years.”

Roughly 99 percent do recover. And many of the lasting effects (undoubtedly attributed to effects of aging and comorbidities) but will undoubtedly be attributed to covid.

And now it really gets interesting as the sarcasm rolls out. (What was that you said about sarcasm btw?)

“In any case, these fine specimens of the medical profession maintain that there is no need to worry even if someone contracts COVID-19 because “simple effective treatments are available.”

And this is in dispute????

Ah yes, that 60 year old arsenac known as hydroxycloriquin. The same highly effective treatment for many illnesses including maleria. But since bad orange man endorsed its effectiveness, citing highly successful track records from Dr’s who have been using it for effective treatment of covid. But the real problem is, its cost effective treatment value. At pennies per dose, how is big pharma to reap their dividens? And if its easily treatable, then how is it possible to employ “fear porn” demanding vaccines? Or to rig an election? Shall we continue?.....

“It is at this point that the snake in the grass, namely hydroxychloroquine, rears its head. Not only is this medication presented as a treatment, but hydroxychloroquine is also claimed to prevent infection if taken prophylactically. Initially, there were some seductive results with hydroxychloroquine, but subsequent trials that were better designed failed to produce any positive results and some even suggested complications in terms of heart function.”

Oh... I would love to hear you dispute the 180 on hcq. Suddenly now that orange man is out, there may be truth to what these “fine specimens of the medical profession maintain.”

( care to debate that DOCTOR? )

To be continued. But for now I will post this so I don’t accidentally lose it in cyberspace on my I Phone.