and far less effective
Ok sparky. But -not- less effective at reducing death rates. It’s a good protection with much less risk. And it’s a good hedge of a bet for a brand new never used type of vaccine, for a corona class virus nobody has ever had a good vaccine for, produced in a rush, but bad globalist people like Fauci and Gates, under political pressure. Oh, and created BEFORE the virus was even identified.
Anyway, the only reason I’m getting it eventually is as a magic talisman that lets me travel and go out. I just need to prove “I got it”, but I am more concerned about a shingles and tetanus shot than a corona shot. So for me, the number one concern is low risk of side effects, not how “effective” it is.
But get it if you want. You do you, boo.
PS.. why are pregnant women not advised to get it?
You have to look carefully at the results, not just the headlines, before you make a blanket statement that the J&J vaccines far less effective. You have to look at both the mortality and the morbidity data. It’s very effective in reducing the severity of the cases and keeping people out of the hospital and off of a ventilator. In their trials it had 100% protection against severe disease which is what is most important, especially for elderly or compromized patients.