You posted to him in post 12. Therefore you started the conversation. So are you requesting that you can post a comment to him but him not to you? That’s seems a little unfair. Granted, I can’t read some of the later posts since they have been removed.
The posts that were removed he called me among other things a third grade drop out and mentally ill in clear contravention of the rules of free republic. I knew posting his factual inaccuracies would draw a severe ad hominem attack. I keep hoping we can have reasonable discourse. However his rhetorical style simply crosses the line.
The reason that i reported his abuse and applaud the mods for removing the posts were because of the personal attacks. On previous threads he has also been equally as bullying and personally attacking
Truthfully i got appropriately thunked on the nose several weeks ago. I learned where the line was and was overly emotional. Now that I know where the line is I simply request equal treatment.
I have been here 20 years as of a week ago. This year has been the toughest with emotionally charged issues. I learned my lesson. We can have reasonable discourse and even emotional. But not personal. And not unlike PDJT if someone want to bully me or take a proverbial swipe. I wlll answer.
Try to find their post where they actually pointed out a factual inaccuracy I made. You won't be able to, because it is pure made up fiction that only exists in the person's head. That happens over and over again. "You claimed X". "I did? Where?", "You know you did, stop being a denier". "But where? What post?", crickets