Replies

Should be banned from here for making us look like idiots. Which isn’t hard these days.

Juan O’Savin. That’s a punchline to a bad joke.

There may be people saying things like that about JOS, but where is the evidence? What are the facts?

Juan owned and ran the largest private investigation firm on the west coast. That can't happen if you don't have appropriate credentials and that won't happen without a few of those being investigated letting their noses get out of joint, quite possibly unjustifiably.

All kinds of people work to get Juan to say Gateway Pundit kinds of things. Bring on the "bombshells!" The set-ups are sometimes very tendentious. "Earth Shattering!"

I don't listen to a lot of Jennifer Mac or "Deplorable McAlister" (nom de guerre alert) to know what impressions those may have wanted to vaguely leave as considerations with their audiences. Generally, however, I believe they're courageously doing very good work. They all remind me of what's said about Declaration signers giving of their blood and treasure. Impressive, talented examples they are.

I'm surprised no one here yet has claimed or at least brought up that many thought that Juan was actually Robert David Steele, just outside the lens' view. That was a big "thing" for a while, though I didn't think their voices were remotely similar. One could nonetheless read such confident-sounding comments in the sidebars of live YouTubes during Juan's interviews. Breathing vapors, I would say.

I believe Juan thinks the death of former publisher of George magazine was faked along with his wife and SIL. I think Juan has said things along that line to have his listeners consider whether that might be the case. One of the biggest "nuggets" in that, I believe, would be that carpetbagging HRC not going to let anyone get between her and that NY senate seat. If more understood reality that way and were more facile with evidence and facts, HRC never could skate as she has these several decades, leaving heaps along the trail of death. With JFK the son's lived history and knowledge about assassinations, he wouldn't have wanted to "go out" that way or live that way all the way up to such an end.

This "make us look like idiots" tear is interesting, of course, but I would've thought most honest people on this thread would be uniquely open to potentials that run contrary to the mainstream media Operation Mockingbird brainwashing. Aren't we? Shouldn't we all be tremendously skeptical of the CIA's known, admitted, constantly-improved-upon plans to propagandize us and use the media at every corner to do so? By bringing in such rallying cries of fear that "we don't want to look like idiots," we're just playing into the hands of Deep State propagandists and lessening the chance that people will be only properly circumspect and "red-pilled" and resistant to the constant barrage of "conspiracy theory" accusations.

President Kennedy was assassinated by the Deep State, largely under the direction of the pedophile Nazi, GHWB. Oooh, but we mustn't say that, should we? If that's our self-defense, we're not dealing honestly with the clear-yet-greatly-suppressed evidence. That cowardice and bad lesson-learning should scare us and our progeny far more than mind-numbed robots thinking us to be or calling us out as idiots.

If that's how even the best researchers among us predictably respond, all the DS need to is send out the propaganzdized, subsidized college-age minions to mindlessly attack us at every turn for being idiotic conspiracy theorists. Oh, wait.

All manner of "thinking outside the box" that later turned out to be correct has earned ridicule from smaller minds along the way. It's been that way for millennia. Science is regularly changing its tune every 40 or 50 years. One shouldn't pretend to ignore the lessons of history.