That case was dismissed. No evidence was allowed to be shown.
Why do you attack me? I’m only discussing that you have your facts wrong. Didn’t you say Rudy has all these myriad cases he lost? You are the one who needs to bone up.
You have no knowledge of me, do you? Where I get my news from? Certainly not FR that is more than a habit as I’m a very long timer here. Many on this forum are vastly uninformed, it’s disappointing based on what FR used to be.
In addition, breaking stories are posted here days later so I know all about the effectiveness or lack thereof on FR.
Try listening to WarRoom and you’ll learn a lot. I read everything. I listen to many podcasts that feature the most informed experts and I think I’m pretty good in my knowledge base.
You on the other hand are not. Cheers though.
Wrong, read the decision. Rudy presented evidence and the Judge didn't find it compelling. I gave you the link to the case, read it instead of listening to grifters who are profiting by lying to people like you.
Why do you attack me?
Because you are repeating falsehoods that hurt Trump and conservatives.
That case was dismissed.
What do you think that means? It wasn't thrown out for lack of standing like many cases. The judge took the case, heard the presentation from Giuliani, and dismissed it because it had no merit. That's called losing a case!! What did you think was going to happen? A jury trial? The judge either blocks the election results (WIN) or dismisses (LOSE). It was a loss.