Moderna: 94.1% effective at preventing symptomatic infections, 100% effective at preventing severe infections, after two doses.
Pfizer: 95% effective at preventing symptomatic infections, nearly 100% effective at preventing severe infections (only 1 case among more than 18,000 vaccinated individuals in the trials), after two doses.
Johnson & Johnson: 66% effective at preventing moderate to severe infections, 85% effective at preventing severe infections, after a single dose.
Note: A J&J executive said its shot may have shown a lower level of efficacy because it was tested at a time when higher levels of the virus, including variants that may evade vaccines, were circulating.
It’s just as much an illusion as the others. What if none of them do anything?
What if the conclusions about the virus and vaccines are based on incomplete and made up facts, then what?
What if I told you that the virus has never been isolated in lab setting and assumptions have been made that can’t be proven?
Look it up.
66% vs 94-95%. I would the J&J vaccine is DOA until they improve it.
Most important for many people is that J&J has produced a traditional vaccine (not an mRNA one) that is one shot.
I am uncertain how/why they can make their claims of effectiveness given the limited time and data, but as of right now after reading much on the subject I am leaning towards waiting for this vaccine.
The mediots and bureaucrats did lie to us - we were told non-stop that we would “have to wait for a vaccine” and yet here we are and they now tell us the vaccine does not mean you cannot get or spread the virus, it only mitigates how sick you may become..... it was oversold.
How exactly is the vaccine supposed to help us?
Friendly reminder that Johnson and Johnson was found guilty of knowing asbestos was in their baby powder. Cost them $29 million. There’s no liability for their va$$ine
It’s not the mRNA type that has never been approved before for human use as an immunization or therapy. It’s a standard vaccine. You are much less of a human Guinea Pig.
Well the J&J one actually contains fetal DNA. The others just use dead babies for testing
J&J uses aborted fetal cells:
https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf
What I want to know is the potential for allergic reactions or cytokine storms of the J&J vaccine verses the Phizer or Moderna vaccines.
Is J&J an mdna vaccine too or a different technology?
An easy way to compare is to show how people have died from the vaccines....
Pick your poison non vaccine.
Hopefully, they can get most of the vaccines past characters like this one.
Wisconsin pharmacist who destroyed more than 500 vaccine doses believes Earth is flat, FBI says
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/wisconsin-pharmacist-who-destroyed-more-than-500-vaccine-doses-believes-earth-is-flat-fbi-says/ar-BB1dhvnD?ocid=uxbndlbing
The J&J vaccine is one of the “abortion fetal cell line/Mengele” types (along w/”AstraZeneca’s”)...probably a “no go” for most Christians.
https://lozierinstitute.org/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-19-vaccine/
This article adds more info than the ‘66% effective” tag being put on JnJ
The better statistic is 100% no deaths and 85% reduced hospitalization
The US Congress has been vaxxed with the other RNA experimental vax ( Pfizer or Moderna) and at least 4 have subsequently been diagnosed with covid
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9201625/J-J-1-dose-shot-prevents-COVID-19-others.html
"We're a single shot ... And now we've produced data that say that our vaccine is highly effective, 85% effective against severe COVID, 100% effective against hospitalization or death,"