An English teacher would say those are ‘comma splices’ and down grade the writer. Novelists use commas to emphasis, to cause a momentary break in the words of a character. In Journalism, the comma splice is a sign of a frustrated novelist who is not proficient in the journalism trade.
BTW, the “to” didn’t make the word emphasis into a verb. Errata is so funny sometimes.
Are you defending the journalist here or at least "praising him with faint criticism?" I would say that the commas are almost totally random here, and could in no way be construed as enhancing clarity.
Regards,