[AZLiberty]

"This is the Big Enchilada, as it were. You'll find it interesting, no matter your political persuasion."

I am reminded of the famous quote from T.S. Eliot:

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.

If Patrick Byrne has it right, the ineffectiveness of Rudy's post-election activities was due as much to Rudy himself as to the obstinacy of the courts and legislatures. As great as Rudy was in his days as prosecutor and mayor, he had lost it by the time the 2020 election fraud was in play. If Patrick Byrne has it right.

With some trepidation, I look forward to more chapters in this story.

[outinyellowdogcountry]

“If Patrick Byrne has it right, the ineffectiveness of Rudy’s post-election activities was due as much to Rudy himself as to the obstinacy of the courts and legislatures.”

If Patrick Byrne is right, by extension, Trump is not on top of the game by trusting Rudy and others.

I guess the story is still being played out. Byrne may have legitimacy but I have more trust in Rudy than Byrne. What has Byrne proven by his life?

[Steven W.]

My read is that there is a camp that includes Rudy, Bannon, etc., that are simply focused on the “garden variety” election fraud that was in & of itself pervasive + extensive and more than enough to overturn the election “results” in the battleground states i.e. the Navarro Reports. It seems these folks are also unable to get into the nuances of the computer driven data vs. the hard realities of having more ballots than registered voters, for example. In order to get to the next levels in the computer fraud aspects of these things, there needs to be actual audits performed. My guess is that if/when those things transpired and could be shown + explained in hard form, they’d get on board, but there is an additional problem that the folks who’ve made these discoveries (Bobby Piton, Edward Solomon, etc.) are working in a complex world in which it’s difficult for them to explain their methods & results.

When I read about the meeting at the WH from Byrne’s perspective, it sounds like he + others were saying at the time which I took with a grain of salt - being that these folks (to include Mike Lindell as well lol) were simply bringing things to the WH that we here on these threads know, etc.. In essence they were asking Trump to play the “Q” / Trump card ... except, if there was such a thing, then I consider Trump would be sitting there thinking “already happening ... wait & see”

TBD + WWG1WGA :)