...If this guy’s “insider” explanations of the motiviations of those involved in the alleged conspiracies do not match actual history, why should I believe anything he says?...
thats just what they are his explanations-opinions to match other info..don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater..
if we found out the cia killed jfk would their motivation matter or would there be different opinions as to why?
To me his words sound like he is presenting them as facts, while giving a video taped deposition. In that case he is claiming to be in position to know this information as factual. What he is saying is out of line with common knowledge. For this me is a warning sign.
If he is giving opinions, then you have a point. In that case, his personal opinions of motivations are irrelevant, if he has other evidence to back it up. So far, Lin Wood has not be able to present any other evidence he has (Democrat courts protecting Democrat vote fraud with the mass media covering for both). So in that case, it makes some sense for Lin to keep what evidence he has, if he has evidence, confidential.
Maybe instead of going through the courts, going to state legislatures with this is the better option since the courts have taken sides. Your thoughts?