Fraud has a particular meaning. Unconstitutional, being rules set by executive instead of legislature, is not the same as fraud.
Fraud is, given a set of rules, ballot stuffing or other votes that do not comply with the rules.
Conflating the two gives the opponent a way to defeat you by failure to address the issue.
This election had both fraud and unconstitutionality.
Deceitful acts for the purpose of gain sounds to me like what was done within these States. Lowering the bar for ballot acceptance due to “Covid” is a ridiculous argument. Does Covid prevent one from being able to follow directions? Would it pass in a court of law? Maybe not but this fight is in the media court and if the left can use language as they see fit, so can the right. As long as we keep fighting in the purity ring while the left is dragging us through the mud hole, we’ll never get anywhere.
Good post, IMO. I would add:
1) It would not have required “widespread fraud” to swing the electoral outcome.
2) If new rules or decisions (accept ballots without addresses??) were made by executive fiat with the thought that they’d benefit one candidate over another, they might be unconstitutional / illegal from a procedural standpoint and fraudulent as well.