radically difrent technology was used on this vaccine. the flue vaccine uses technology over 40 years old. I would make the same statement about the flue vaccine but believe it is safer. not anti vaxer but you make a mistake if you dont look at the info on vaccines. every thing in medicine is a cost benefit risk assessment anyone that does not understand that is a fool. how many people with minor back problems have back procedures only to find it made things worse. but that does not mean you dont have back surgeries what you do is asses whether the risk outweighs the benefit.
“radically difrent technology was used on this vaccine”
There are two vaccines out right now and the third will be out the first of next month and they are all three made with different technology so which one are you talking about?
All have been well tested and have shown to be safe. Johnson and Johnson, the third one suspended all testing when one, one single person, in their test group got sick and it was then found that it had nothing to do with the vaccine. Testing was continued and not a single other person had any problems.
So which tech are you talking about?
And you still did not answer the question, do you understand what a dead spore serum is? Would you like to enlighten people or should I?
I’ll give you a hint, the flu shot which you judge as being safer is also a dead spore serum.