I could be wrong (I’ll research it if need be) but I’m thinking that there was a lawsuit about DACA that prevented it from going away? Or at least partially staying.
If I recall correctly, an activist judge ruled against undoing DACA. But I might have it confused with one of the other multitude of activist judge’s opinions.
SCOTUS ruled on DACA...not on constitutional grounds(they should have)
“We do not decide whether DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) or its rescission are sound policies,” Roberts said. “We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients.””