It depends on how one defines “riddled”. The Rats knew that they only had to cheat by a few thousand votes...perhaps 1% of the votes cast...in three or four states. And...viola!...they found three candidates which had filthy,Trump hating Rat Governors (PA,MI,WI) and one with a Swamp Creature RINO Governor (GA).
“...amateur affidavits aren’t credible evidence...”
Definition of affidavit - a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.
but a fake dossier originating with the Clinton campaign is credible enough to throw the country into a tizzy for 3 years; fake charges of “sexual misconduct” are credible enough to smear a Supreme Court nominee; “anonymous’ sources are credible enough to smear someone for days, weeks, months or even years; quotes taken out of context are credible enough of repeat over and over again for years.
All of the above was used by the WaPo and all the other outlets for the last 5 years, and now they are saying “amateur affidavits” aren’t credible. Notice that none of the stuff that the WaPo found credible was confirmed by oath or affirmation.
It’s maddening that there’s no way to leave a comment or to contact the writer of this story at the WP. They should also run a poll on how many leftists still believe that Trump colluded with Russia to win the election. It was a hoax and a lie, and one that the WP fully participated in.
Gaslight media.
Note the careful weasel words bolded above. There is no "credible" (to whom? Who decided this?) evidence of any "significant" fraud - (what does "significant" mean? And who decided that?)
A more honest author would have admitted that there is considerable evidence of a good deal of election fraud, even more evidence of a "significant" cover-up of which this article is one piece, and conclusive evidence that the media never did, and are never going to, investigate the matter.
President Grifter Darkwinter and Congress do not have the consent of the governed.
I have a prediction: only about 65 million people will vote for Biden in 2024. Of course, his opponent will only get about 62 million so biden will win.
And no one will find anything strange in that massive reduction in votes compared to the number of votes for each candidate in 2020.
Have read in the past couple of weeks that closer to 70% didn’t believe the results. I sure the h3ll don’t!
If you think Joe Biden legitimately got over ten million more votes than Barak Obama did you must be kidding.
More like 7 in 10
I know there was a lie about a water main break so they could kick out the observers. I saw the lie broadcast live on election night. They said they were stopping counting for the night. They didn’t. They pulled out boxes of hidden ballots and ran the same piles through the machines multiple times. I saw the videos. I don’t give crap about the lying rewrites. I saw what happened and I saw our media, courts and lifetime politicians ignore it and then tell me I didn’t see what I saw. They can kiss my ass. This election was fraudulent.
False premise. Out of the some three thousand counties in the US, the questionable actions focus on about 6. But those 6 swung the swing states which swung the election.
When will the mainstream media and the Democratic party finally admit that their entire Russian collusion narrative for the 2016 election was a hoax?
Let me know when they stop using “Mail in ballots” then I might believe there was no Fraud
My thing is I don’t know for sure that there was massive election fraud but one thing is for sure, they wouldn’t look at the evidence and THAT stinks to high heaven.
And what about the “broken water main/pipe/leak whatever?” That “lie” was spread by the all-knowing media and was the excuse that counting stopped?
Strangely worn like a badge of honor...
At least they’re admitting it.
I read a poll about 5 years ago. I forget what the subject was but buried in the question was one about believing Obama was born in the US. 70% yes, 30% no.
So, having a third of the public believing POTUS is illegitimate is NORMAL.
What’s different this time is the source of the illegitimacy. Now, the election process has lost the trust of the public. And elections are the ruse that governments use to claim legitimacy.
“Some will dismiss my arguments as illegitimate...”
Well, Phil, no doubt we’d do just that if you had made any arguments, but you didn’t. Unsupported assertions are not arguments.