Well, thank you very much for your outstanding references that quite frankly were very well laid out with much labor as to your part. As you can see I am not a lawyer, and I very much appreciate your effort and very valuable time.
But I am not trying to write a enjoyable story, I actual find the situation quite distasteful, if fascinating.
However I think having the bio weapon, (it is patented, therefore man made), released deliberately, by restricting all flights out of Wuhan domestically but open internationally, clearly shows intent. And matched with the stated strategy papers leaked from China speculating that as a viable strategy to weaken an opponent as a strategic, not tactical move is damning on Chinas Part.
The purchase of 600 million dollars of Dominion shares, the 305th intelligence battalion tracing and recording the interference with the election and the 2018 eo spelling out that an attack on our critical infrastructure is considered an act of War places the paid for cooperation with the ccp to block discovery as a act of treason DURING A TIME OF WAR if said EO was invoked.
(Sorry for he all caps, too lazy to html this entire post for a little bold)
So, as per above the only question remains is who tries for treason, in theater, during a time of war with the use of a weapon of mass destruction, a political figure like Biden after committing treason to overthrow the government by abetting the foreign power in its act of War. Will it be military or civilian courts?
Especially with Biden taking of disbanding the US Army and inviting China in for domestic “defense” On his first day in office? Are we surrendering already?
His acceptance of Bribery in multiple schemes with China is overwhelming established at this point. It could be simply postulated that he is a spy for that foreign power that is at war with us.
Seems pretty clear to me a firing squad is warranted by the DOJ. My guess is the Army will do the firing squad either before or after it is disbanded.
Because if Biden hands us all over to the Chinese, obviously everyone in the Pentagon is a dead man walking.
I actual[ly] find the situation quite distasteful, if fascinating.
Just having a Biden/Harris administration is distasteful.
However I think having the bio weapon, (it is patented, therefore man made), released deliberately, by restricting all flights out of Wuhan domestically but open internationally, clearly shows intent. And matched with the stated strategy papers leaked from China speculating that as a viable strategy to weaken an opponent as a strategic, not tactical move is damning on Chinas Part.
It is not clear if you state this as hypothetical speculation or as fact. The government has not adopted a position that it was a deliberate release.
As a bio-weapon, the Wu-Flu is not particularly effective. It is not extremely lethal as is Ebola. It does not disable the population in general. Government lockdowns and regulations disable large sectors of the population.
If engaging in speculation, you may consider the possibility that the timing of the release just happened to provide maximum benefit to one political party. The first Dem debate looked like a clown show. There was no viable candidate acceptable to the Dem establishment. In 2016, Wikileaks demonstrated that the Dem powers rigged the primaries for Hillary and against Bernie. This time, everyone miraculously dropped out to leave Biden as the only one left. Joe was as animated as Bernie Lomax (Weekend at Bernie's). He could not survive the rigors of a traditional campaign. And the Wu-Flu comes and Trump cannot hold his giant rallies, and Joe doesn't need to campaign at all. There was no political campaign, there was a marketing campaign, with endless advertising selling a product. The Wu-Flu release did not have to be an enemy action to start a war, it could have been a symbiotic action in coordination with the powers that be who wanted Trump out and Biden in. Perhaps it was just fortuitous timing and not letting a crisis go to waste. As speculation, it is worth pondering.
The purchase of 600 million dollars of Dominion shares, the 305th intelligence battalion tracing and recording the interference with the election and the 2018 eo spelling out that an attack on our critical infrastructure is considered an act of War places the paid for cooperation with the ccp to block discovery as a act of treason DURING A TIME OF WAR if said EO was invoked.
I am not aware of U.S. legal cases regarding the virus blocking some sort of discovery. Perhaps China was not forthcoming with the international community, but that is not treason in the U.S. There have been discovery issues in election cases, but that is not about the virus.
There was, and is, no state of war. The EO does not state that there is an existing attack on our infrastructure which has been identified as an act of war. The only way to put the nation in an official state of war is for the government to explicitly acknowledge a state of war by some overt act. A declaration of war would work, but in the civil war (officially The War of the Rebellion, perhaps most accurately The War Between the States) a proclamation of a blockade worked, as such is an international act (a nation cannot blockade itself), not a domestic act (closing of the ports) and recognized a conflict between belligerent powers (recognized the Confederacy as the de facto government of the affected area). For all legal purposes, the Supreme Court identified that proclamation, and that date, as the start of that war, and not anything that came before. That case is The Protector, 79 U.S. 700 (1870).
Only the government has the power to determine an official time of war.
So, as per above the only question remains is who tries for treason, in theater, during a time of war with the use of a weapon of mass destruction, a political figure like Biden after committing treason to overthrow the government by abetting the foreign power in its act of War. Will it be military or civilian courts?
Joe Biden is not subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice and cannot be tried by a military court-martial. A court-martial is not a judicial proceeding, but is a creature of the Executive Branch. It has jurisdiction over military members. Even as Commander-in-Chief, Biden is a civilian, exercising civilian control of the military.
He could not be tried for a criminal offense in a civilian court either unless he was first impeached and removed from office. While in office, Slick Willie did not have immunity from a civil case brought by Paula Jones.
That leaves a military commission. This is not a court and is not bound by the same rules and precedents which are binding in the courts.
Neither Joe Biden, nor any other U.S. citizen, is amenable to trial by a military commission. Federal law applies:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/948c
10 U.S. Code § 948c - Persons subject to military commissionsAny alien unprivileged enemy belligerent is subject to trial by military commission as set forth in this chapter.
(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2576.)
The Military Commissions Act of 2009 (MCA 2009): Overview and Legal Issues Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney August 4, 2014, R41163
At page 9:
Citizens who fit the definition of “unprivileged enemy belligerent” are not amenable to trial by military commission under the MCA.
The Constitution Art. 1, §8, cl. 9, provides that "Congress shall have the Power... To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court." Congress has authorized military tribunals under the Military Commissions Act of 2009. It has withheld jurisdiction to try U.S. citizens in such a tribunal.