If the relevant process is fraudulent, then so is the oath and the swearing in.
Remember when:
President Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox; Richardson refused and resigned effective immediately. Nixon then ordered Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus to fire Cox; Ruckelshaus refused, and also resigned. Nixon then ordered the third-most-senior official at the Justice Department, Solicitor General Robert Bork, to fire Cox. Bork carried out the dismissal as Nixon asked.
Do you see what I mean? The President does what he wants! Especially when he has a Congress of his own party that would never deign to impeach him for the most horrible offense. Just think about it for a minute. After tomorrow at noon, it is a fait accompli and all of our geese are cooked.
What I meant to convey was the sovereignty of law.
Biden can never be president in agreement with the law, rather he can only be president in disagreement with the law.
The only question is: Will Law be defeated by its arch enemy, Politics?
I don’t believe it will.
Kind of a weird example you cite as obviously Nixon was NOT untouchable
That’s not true.
If the relevant process is fraudulent, then so is the oath and the swearing in.
OK, you just don't get I guess.
Remember when:
President Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox; Richardson refused and resigned effective immediately. Nixon then ordered Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus to fire Cox; Ruckelshaus refused, and also resigned. Nixon then ordered the third-most-senior official at the Justice Department, Solicitor General Robert Bork, to fire Cox. Bork carried out the dismissal as Nixon asked.
Do you see what I mean? The President does what he wants! Especially when he has a Congress of his own party that would never deign to impeach him for the most horrible offense. Just think about it for a minute. After tomorrow at noon, it is a fait accompli and all of our geese are cooked.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ransomnote: I don't agree with you either.
Nancy can swear a ham sandwich into office and CNN can be there to record it all but it doesn't mean our geese are cooked. It actually means nothing.
It's not like once you put forth a collosal clumsy effort to steal an election they HAVE to let you become president.
Stealing the election invalidates the election results. Having evidence of treason, and that you accepted bribes to become a puppet of Communist China "ruins" your whole day and they don't even let you become president after all.