Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

I see\saw all and understand all that...and here we are watching Pres. Trump’s farewell address.
(Not carried by anyone except FOX)

You really haven’t answered my question re: the stats.
is it possible the stats were misread?
Do people go to rallies to “see” The President of the United States regardless of party?

Das ist alles.


2,524 posted on 01/19/2021 1:50:52 PM PST by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2508 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

(Not carried by anyone except FOX)
**************
Newsmax carried it.


2,536 posted on 01/19/2021 2:00:59 PM PST by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2524 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a
I see\saw all and understand all that...and here we are watching Pres. Trump’s farewell address.
(Not carried by anyone except FOX)

You really haven’t answered my question re: the stats.
is it possible the stats were misread?
Do people go to rallies to “see” The President of the United States regardless of party?

Das ist alles.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes. They go to rallies if they realize what's at stake.

I thought I answered your question - I said rally attendance under reported actual support for the president.

Trump's overwhelming rally attendance more than matches the votes.

Trump said he won and there was significant cheating. Others I respect said that as well. My own observations showed it.

So, Trump did not lie when he said he won. Trump did not lie when he said there was cheating. Therefore voters were supporting him - roll that back to his rally attendance - the voters behind Trump's landslide win attended rallies. To get the number of votes he won required non-Republicans or voting blocs (Blacks, Hispanics) to cross the aisle.

Re Trump's Farwell Address, and FLOTUS'S Farwell Message, I've posted about that here:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As I understand it, the calls by Flynn, McInerny and others for "Limited Martial Law" involves the stepping down of the President, the military takes control and holds a fair election, the new president is elected and sworn in.

And, as elections are to be fair, one doesn't state who will be the next president until a fair election is held. You let people vote, and wait for the decision.

I, along with General Flynn and many others, believe that President Trump will absolutely be sworn in as our next president. But first, a fair election must be held.

~~~~~~~~~~~

This isn't my own  reasoning. When I heard Mike Flynn use the term, "limited Martial Law" I had to look it up because I'd never heard of it. It describes the process of the military conducting a fair election. I think I've assumed we all read this content before and this is what I have had in view since that time.

Tonight, I haven't searched far - I know Flynn's  is/was on video talking about it, but I'll use some content he linked from his Twitter, which I believe has since been deleted. The content Flynn linked in his Tweet is still present on a 3rd party website and describes the same idea of "Limited Martial Law" that I'd heard/read Flynn talk about. 

Below is a thread post which contains an excerpt:

Mike Flynn: How About Some “Limited” Martial Law And A Military-Run Election Do-Over?
hotair.com ^ | December 2, 2020 | ALLAHPUNDIT

Posted on 1/18/2021, 10:24:17 PM by ransomnote

SNIP

https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1333916403389370369

Follow the link in his tweet and it’ll take you here, where you’ll find this:

When the legislators, courts and/or Congress fail to do their duty under the 12th Amendment, you must be ready Mr. President to immediately declare a limited form of Martial Law, and temporarily suspend the Constitution and civilian control of these federal elections, for the sole purpose of having the military oversee a national re-vote. A vote that assures a fair election in every jurisdiction and reflects the true will of the people. Federal candidates only. Paper ballots. No computers. Hand-counted with both parties watching every vote. Only registered voters. Photo ID to prove residence. Conducted safely with everyone wearing masks and six feet apart, just like we did in Ohio. Only then can the winning candidate be accepted as legitimate by a true majority of We the People who must give our consent to be justly governed! Unfortunately we are at a point where we can only trust our military to do this because our corrupt political class and courts have proven their inability to act fairly and within the law.

You must also act, like Lincoln did, to silence the destructive media’s one-sided propaganda designed and proven to influence the election outcome, and end the unlawful censorship of Big Tech, to restore the confidence of the American People in our electoral process or we cannot continue as a nation. Failure to do so could result in massive violence and destruction on a level not seen since the Civil War. Limited Martial Law is clearly a better option than Civil War!

The piece begins with a reminder that Lincoln imprisoned newspaper editors and political critics during the Civil War, in case you’re wondering what Flynn has in mind in that second paragraph. I say this in all sincerity: I’m surprised that Trump hasn’t retweeted Flynn today or tweeted out a link to the “We The People” page with some sly comment attached like “Interesting idea!” It’s an uncharacteristic show of restraint, especially now that his cronies have begun to turn up the heat on what they’ll support to keep him in power.

SNIP


2,551 posted on 01/19/2021 2:09:34 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2524 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson