Gizmodo: Amazon Court Filing Includes Chilling Death Threats Published on Parler

Gizmodo ^ | Jan 13 | Matt Novak

[RandFan]

Amazon submitted a new filing in federal court on Tuesday in response to an emergency motion by Parler to restore its hosting services through Amazon’s AWS. Parler was kicked offline early Monday after Amazon said the social media company had violated its terms of service and Parler couldn’t find another company willing to do business. Parler sued Amazon on Monday alleging breach of contract and an antitrust violation.

Read the rest...

[Olog-hai]

Ad hominem? Just for asking questions?

Like I said, enjoy your stay.

[setter]

I don’t deal with internet bullies so this is the last thing I will say. Why is no one agreeing with you. Everyone knows what I meant.

[Olog-hai]

I was not bullying you. Asking questions is not bullying. I only wanted a direct answer instead of evasion.

With all due respect, you are exhibiting a persecution complex. That’s common among liberals, I’ve noticed.

[SecAmndmt]

“People who will have no problem bombing or assasinating to get what they want.”

Not a coherent definition.

The “far right” defined by leftists group conservatives, libertarians and neo-Nazis. But the Nazis are statist, collectivist, socialist, interventionist just like the “far left”. In reality Nazis are simply “racist far left”. They do not belong with libertarians, Constitutionalists and conservatives. Too read a Freeper making this basic mistake makes me wonder whether you are a leftist or simply stupid?

[SecAmndmt]

“With all due respect, you are exhibiting a persecution complex. That’s common among liberals, I’ve noticed.”

Yep..

[Olog-hai]

Well, Marxist leftists are themselves racist. What national socialists try to appeal to is the national identity versus some international notion of “the working class” although they obviously try to appeal to the working class of the particular nation they are addressing. Nasser described himself as both nationalist and socialist, using terms such as “pan-Arabism”, which is evocative of the Nazis’ “pan-Germanism”.

Woodrow Wilson espoused similar beliefs.

… (I)t is very clear that in fundamental theory, socialism and democracy are almost, if not quite, one and the same. They both rest at bottom upon the absolute right of the community to determine its own destiny and that of its members. Men as communities are supreme over men as individuals. …

Equating democracy with socialism results in democracy becoming a collectivist ideology, with the community (cf. state) being supreme over, and more important than, the individual. That of course devolves towards groups of individuals that are non-state-affiliated, i.e. particular races.

[sarge83]

If you own it then ban it if you like but don’t lecture others how you’re for free speech. I get it, you own the site do as you please. If there is a site that does allow the free flow of information then as I said you take the good with the bad. But those sites are not allowed by either side of the aisle. What we are finding is in reality unless the words come from your mouth or pen to paper there is no free speech and if your employer doesn’t like what you say at the bar or church or the neighborhood bbq then he tells you to shut up or else, so is there really such a thing as free speech in America? Not really the corporations regulate their slaves quite well. I’m glad the founding fathers ignored their version of corporations the crown and at least gave us a good 200 year.