Posted on 01/11/2021 7:45:34 PM PST by Traveler59
I agree!
Similar to this:
-PJ
How did big tech get so much power over the internet? Did they buy it? Did they just take it? How?
"Big Tech" isn't any different from any other large accumulation of capital in American history. In general, they are companies that created a product which revolutionized the market, or created a new one, or displaced the existing market leader, etc etc. There isn't anything special about it, for the most part:
I have all of you beat - I remember using punchcards instead of keyboards. For on class we had periodic assignments to create simple programs (in FORTRAN!) and would leave our bundle rubber-handed together in a file drawer in the computer room for the computer geeks to run at night or over the weekend. If you REALLY didn’t like someone you slipped a rather file piece of Swiss or Limberger cheese in with his or her cards (the computer geeks really appreciated that) :>)
We played some games like Star Trek or landing a rocket on the Moon over a 300 baud line...slower than s huff!
Blockchain is the next big innovation right around the corner.
All you guys appear to be mere babes in the woods.
I remember calling people up on my g randma’s crank telephone and the whole town practically (10 people) could listen in coz it was a PARTY LINE.
Spot on!
The Apple explanation is too perfect. It freaks me out the way Rush just gushes over all of his Apple toys. Didn’t catch him today.
I’m an old school FIDOnet and Usenet guy. Anyone else remember uuencoding to turn binaries into text? Ah the good old days when you got a solid 1200 baud connection and no one questioned why you had three phone lines going into your apartment...
I wonder if Stuxnet is still around?
” There are many more old-time geeks out there with ideas.”
I’m sure they’re too busy to write viruses, pat said virus on the head and say go meet Amazon or...
Blockchain is the next big innovation right around the corner.
I agree. Institutional investment in blockchain is taking place under the radar at an incredible pace. I believe BTC will hit 50k easily this year and 100k is not out of the question in my opinion. This recent bull run and correction shows that BTC is being treated like any other store of value by the institutions, and there's no better endorsement of the technology than that. I took a position at 3k a few years ago and am happily HODL for the foreseeable future :) I mean, it could all blow up in our faces, too, but life is short, y'know?
Well, this is all fun and stuff, but, practically speaking:
If the commies keep pushing this, possibly undermining even operations like GAB, how does President Trump maintain contact with freedom loving people to whom most of what you posted is tech gibberish. (That would be most of them — most people already have very busy lives without taking on a new expertise.)
Same question, but for organized contact between those people. Even DJT can’t run everything in a struggle for freedom.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse
Plain English explanation though outdated, hence the future tense; https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/03/introduction-distributed-social-network
Excerpts:
But federated social network developers are doing two things differently in order to build a new ecosystem. First, the leading federated social networking software is open-source: that means that anybody can download the source code, and use it to create and maintain social networking profiles for themselves and others. Second, the developers are simultaneously collaborating on a new common language, seeking an environment where most or even all federated social networking profiles can talk to one another.
To join a federated social network, you'll be able to choose from an array of "profile providers," just like you can choose an email provider. You will even be able to set up your own server and provide your social networking profile yourself. And in a federated social network, any profile can talk to another profile — even if it's on a different server.
Imagine the Web as an open sea. To use Facebook, you have to immigrate to Facebook Island and get a Facebook House, in a land with a single ruler. But the distributed social networks being developed now will allow you to choose from many islands, connected to one another by bridges, and you can even have the option of building your own island and your own bridges.
Friendica, Diaspora, Mastadon are three such pieces of software and they are compatible with each other to some degree. Friendica for instance is compatible with; Friendica, Diaspora, GNU-Social, Mastodon, email, RSS feeds via native protocol support.
So if there were 100,000 members running on 100 installations, how would big tech know who's who? That would also mean there could be 1,000 members on each of the 100 installations. Less concern about needing a room full of server racks or relying on amazon's AWS. This software won't run on your $5/mth shared hosting however but mostly because they all require root access to install via command line. There is hosting that will give you root access that doesn't cost an arm and a leg. Maybe $20/mth which would be fine for 1,000 users or maybe more. Pretty affordable imho. Most are written in php which all web hosts have.
I see this as the way of the future for social networking, especially these days. Since it requires typing commands into a terminal, conservatives would need to "Learn to Code". Not really though. You can copy and paste. One would need to know how to obtain and use a hosting account, eg; cpanel. I know many of the young conservatives like on thedonald.win know this stuff. I build websites so I know it. I joined a Friendica server years ago but it was all techies and therefor leftists/liberals at the time. There's around 200 servers running GNU-Social and and 200 Friendica and 3,900 for Mastodon but Mastodon is microblogging a la twitter.
THIS
NOT THIS
Pretty good representation in that second pic with all roads leading to Silicon Valley. Also makes one think of the United Stated compared to communism or a monarchy which has a single State. Speaking of monarchy, even though we have alternative social networks like gab, parler, mewe etc, it's still one entity running the show and now we have a larger entity shutting down parler so maybe it's more like feudalism in a sense. This Distributed Social Networking gives control back to the people. I don't know Andrew Torba other than he runs gab. He could end up not being a good guy and get busted for something and have everything taken away, including gab. He could have health or family issues and just give up on gab. Then all the members are SOL. Same with Parler or anyone else that's not a huge, publicly traded org with a board of directors and/or investors.
Nicely done.
That is ok for the IT savvy, or even sorta savvy, but 60 million Trump supporters’ eyes glaze...
The only way it’s gonna work is, for average users:
Simple link to a simple sign-in (or sign-up) page.
Once logged in, simple, user friendly GIU. There’s really not THAT much wrong with FR’s, except that if this is to serve as more than just a political connectivity vehicle, to help bring in users, something a little more up to date may be needed.
That said, no knowledge of HTML, command line, etc., should be needed. (Gad, I tire of having to add paragraph breaks every time there is other HTML in a post I’m writing.)
Link to forum rules posted prominently on home page.
I could live with non-intrusive ads if need be.
Because...?
I am not a tech geek, so keep it simple! What is the gist of your essay? Big Tech won't be able to shut down regular Internet-users (who lack advanced skills) because...?
Regards,
“How did big tech get so much power over the internet? Did they buy it? Did they just take it? How?”
Actually, yes they did buy it; one politician at a time.
Also, since Algore invented the internet it was destined to thwart Conservatives.
I remember NewsNet.
Of course I’m old enough to have actually *used* punch cards for programming.
Took me back with the Agent - what would you recommend for binary newsgroups...a lot of the music groups have so many articles (songs) that most newsreaders I have tried get bogged down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.