[A Navy Vet]

Lots of good info, but if the USSC willy-nilly uses "no standing", then what good is it?

I get the 12th Amendment and the Individual States having their own electoral laws/rules. I've been a States' advocate for years. However, in Bush vs Gore, the ruling was the Governors/SOS could not defy their own State Constitutions. It was a good ruling and was part of the Texas lawsuit.

"People here ask if the military will support Trump when the Insurrection Act is announced to reverse the corrupt election. Some in the top brass may not, but when the rank and file understands that their votes were stolen for a senile, illegitimate pretender POTUS, I think they will."

More importantly, do the National Guard week-end warriors want kill their parents, siblings, and friends? Forget the the top brass. What will the upper enlisted order? BTW, this is moot because there will be no face down in a field or on the streets. If come to be, it will be a clandestine guerilla war. Guess who will be targeted first.

Remember to smell the flowers, Doctor. Peace be with you and our Nation.

[Dr. Franklin]

Lots of good info, but if the USSC willy-nilly uses "no standing", then what good is it?

It means the we have rights without remedies, which means they aren't really rights. It isn't just SCOTUS. It's the lower federal courts as well. People love the Federalist Society type judges because they don't want courts creating rights like gay marriage without action from the legislature. However, these same judges think that civil rights cases for violation of individual rights, (not for certain classes of people) are beneath them. They treat civil rights cases with the attitude of "the peasants are revolting". Voting rights was just another technicality to be finessed, not vindicated.