Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
You know it will. The condition that allows the Insurrection act to be invoked is that conditions "make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings..." That is not the circumstances currently. Courts are operating openly and freely in all parts of the country.

Courts in the U.S. can't easily assert jurisdiction over foreign defendants using military satellites to cause mischief over the Internet. Moreover, it's POTUS's judgment if, in his opinion, "the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2)opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

And what part of the Insurrection Act gives the President the power to do that?

See above. If they have CJ Roberts on tape telling Breyer that he would make sure Trump didn't get reelected, there is ample evidence to send him to Gitmo. Refusing to schedule cases related to the election at SCOTUS, where he is in the minority, certainly is obstructing the execution of the laws of the United States and impeding the course of justice under those laws. That's without considering the more salacious allegations being made about him.
200 posted on 01/10/2021 4:23:01 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Franklin
Courts in the U.S. can't easily assert jurisdiction over foreign defendants using military satellites to cause mischief over the Internet.

And invoking the Insurrection Act allows him to do that how?

Moreover, it's POTUS's judgment if, in his opinion, "the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2)opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

But it is emphatically not his call to determine whether conditions make it impracticable to enforce the laws through normal judicial proceedings. And that is a requirement for imposing the Insurrection Act in the first place.

See above. If they have CJ Roberts on tape telling Breyer that he would make sure Trump didn't get reelected, there is ample evidence to send him to Gitmo.

It's illegal to detain a U.S. citizen in Gitmo without trial, as any court allowed to operate would quickly point out. So your plan would require martial law and suspension of the courts, Congress, and the Constitution.

Refusing to schedule cases related to the election at SCOTUS, where he is in the minority, certainly is obstructing the execution of the laws of the United States and impeding the course of justice under those laws.

Just because you don't like the verdict doesn't mean courts aren't operating as they should. It just means you disagree with them.

202 posted on 01/10/2021 4:30:29 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson