I'm guessing is for the (s)election of Pelosi? They need to be there in person as per the constitution.
As I understand it some Democrats have been voting by proxy...
1 posted on
01/03/2021 10:16:20 AM PST by
RandFan
To: RandFan
2 posted on
01/03/2021 10:19:44 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: RandFan
>>I’m guessing is for the (s)election of Pelosi?
Correct
To: RandFan
Has the Conquistador lady in the House claimed she's being disenfranchised, yet?
To: RandFan
Let the Democrats in the House vote absentee for Nanzi.
They will have to explain how Nanzi Pelosi got 666 votes when there are only 435 members.
To: RandFan
The house passed a rule change to allow remote voting. That rule has now sunsetted.
8 posted on
01/03/2021 10:27:21 AM PST by
Gen.Blather
(Wait! I said that out loud? )
To: RandFan
There is an area encased by Plexiglas in the House Gallery Sign says:
Do Not Feed the House Members Bribes
"See? Told you it was better to vote from our lounge chairs at home in the mansions. We had the limo driver take us here from the airport for this?"
11 posted on
01/03/2021 10:45:59 AM PST by
frank ballenger
(End vote fraud harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
To: RandFan
Who's running against her? Or does it matter?
What's it called when you have an election and only one person is on the ballot?
14 posted on
01/03/2021 10:47:26 AM PST by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson