If you are reading this, then now would be a good time to decide if you really want to know the truth or not.
The truth is, that the ballots were counted three times.
Once in the original election done with Dominion machines.
Once in the RLA which hand counted all the paper ballots WITHOUT using a Dominion anything for the determination or counting of the ballots.
Then yet a third time which used the Dominion equipment again.
So while it is true that they "recounted" in the DJT for Trump Campaign request for a recount using the Dominion machines, that was the third count of the ballots and the second count still agreed with the results of the Election in Georgia for President.
As I said previously, it is pretty hard to get around that 100% hand recount. So what if we hear voting tabulators counted the same votes differently five times? I can discount it in that the RLA count did not use any kind of scanner except a human scanner and the result of the machines was verified. I hate it, but then again, I am glad they did all three counts. My conclusion is that there was no mischief in the counting of the paper ballots in the Georgia Presidential Race. So there must be invalid paper ballots injected into the system and counted (note that ballots have to equal voters kept by yet a different system for security) or Trump lost the Georgia popular vote.
So there must be invalid paper ballots injected into the system and counted (note that ballots have to equal voters kept by yet a different system for security) or Trump lost the Georgia popular vote.
all evidence points to trump winning georgia
I disagree. Read the article at the link, and then look into Georgia’s recount laws. Georgia law prohibits a manual recount unless there are no working scanners or there’s a court order.
https://billmoyers.com/story/georgias-hand-count-of-2020-ballots-was-no-risk-limiting-audit/
From the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia
Rule 183-1-15-.03. Recount Procedure
Recount by Manual Hand Count
(a) A recount shall be conducted by manual hand count only:
1. As provided under Rule 183-1-15-.03(1)(c); or
2. Pursuant to a court order.
183-1-.03 (c)
(c) Prior to conducting a recount, the election superintendent shall test each ballot scanner to be used in the recount. A test deck shall be prepared to include at least 75 ballots marked by an electronic ballot marker and 25 absentee ballots marked by hand that were cast in the election to be recounted. The ballots shall be selected from at least 3 different precincts, if available. The selection of individual ballots from a precinct’s ballot container shall be conducted in a manner that selects ballots from throughout the ballot container. The test desk shall be tabulated by the ballot scanner or scanners to be used in the recount using one or more batches. A manual hand count of the test deck shall be made and compared to the electronic tabulation of the test deck. If the two counts do not match, the discrepancy shall be researched and additional tests may be run. If the discrepancy cannot be resolved so that the manual hand count and electronic tabulation of the test deck matches, the ballot scanner shall not be used in the recount. If, after testing all available ballot scanners, there are no ballot scanners authorized to be used in the recount, the recount shall be conducted by manual hand count. Upon completion of the test, the test deck ballots shall be returned to their original ballot containers.
did recount compare number of ballots purchased, and delivered, did they take inventory or count all unused and spoiled ballots then subtract all voted ballots? an audit should include inventory controls and audit totals of all ballots nnot just recount cast ballots-worthless.. apparently there were none. unused ballots should not have been shredded..
Do you know how well that was supervised? What I saw, anecdotally was observers being thwarted in some counties.