As far as I can make out, the presentation said the fraud occurred between the central gathering of the SD cards and the reporting of the votes. Thus, the Dominion counting / reporting system reported negative vote totals for Trump when the reporting chronology should only have ever been an incremental process.
There were other things thrown in like impossible statistics and adjudicated ballots where no "proof" of fraud was offered. At the end, I believe what was said about adjudicated ballots destroying the original ballot is just plain wrong. Maybe it destroys the electronic image of the original ballot within the Dominion system, but I have read before that both images are saved when a ballot is adjudicated.
REGARDLESS, in the presentation, the fraud is proposed to be AFTER the ballot casting process. NOTE that in Georgia, the ballot casting process IS NOT ELECTRONIC ONLY. The ballot casting process also includes a paper ballot record. Thus ALL ballots cast in Georgia have a paper evidence trail. The evidence trail is to show the intent of the voter SEPARATE from all the electronic counters.
Assuming that a smoking gun is present in that presentation (which I doubt), then how would one go about PROVING that the totals uploaded to the SYTL server were manipulated before being reported?
One way might be to count all the paper ballots (the evidence trail of the intent of the voter) by hand and catch them red handed. Right? Well, in Georgia, that is exactly what we did. We TURNED OFF all the Dominion equipment and counted all the paper ballots BY HUMAN to see if the reported counts had been manipulated. Note that this was only done for the Presidential race. Thus, a paper ballot was scanned by human eyes and determined who it was cast for, Trump, Biden, none, or other.
That process should have shown if reported tallies for President by electronically through the Dominion system was tampered with as proposed by the expert team in the video.
Well, if you set that up in your mind as the way to catch them, and it doesn't catch them, what should the conclusion be? Why did I even waste the 22 minutes watching the video when what they presented has ALREADY BEEN REFUTED? Why am I even offering this post?
I want it to be true, but it isn't true. Not in Georgia. There is something wrong with anyone who won't be shown the facts I put above. I was willing to watch the video to see if there was some plausible real irrefutable evidence, but alas none was presented that hadn't ALREADY been tested and shown not to be true.
We are a pitiful lot. Yes the election was stolen but all we can muster is a few incompetent theories that are easy to refute.
So what's my plan? First, to go vote on Tuesday. I tried three times to early vote but would not wait in line 2+ hours to do so. I did not have that problem in the General election where the ballot was much more complicated. I really don't get how that line wasn't just zipping through for the runoff, but it wasn't. I will wait whatever time is necessary on Tuesday though.
Second, I will take the form of our opposition when Trump got elected. I will "resist" since I will not accept that Biden was elected. I will support any effort to thwart him from governing as he hopes to. I don't know how successful that will be, but he will not be governing with my consent.
With all that said though I refuse to claim fraud proven when fraud has not been proven. I'm not going to do it. Show me something better than that 22 minute video and maybe I will go to DC after voting. But, and this is for the Georgia vote which I have followed intently and invested many hours in, I have not seen anything that I doubt more than the result. That is pretty pitiful but true. The Senate runoff will tell me a lot about the state of Georgia at this point.
That may be true in some systems. But the salient question is whether the recount readjudicated or not. It doesn't sound like the recount did anything more than recount the ballots post-adjudication. So the recount wasn't an audit of the process, just an audit of the result of the potentially fraudulent adjudication process.
Second, and I don't know the answer, but is it possible that the decrements were due to pre-adjudication and post-adjudication differences? The tabulators may have reported original results based on machine scans, then flagged the ballots that needed to be adjudicated (the flagging could be configured to be excessive). Then after adjudication of each of those, potentially flipping the votes, the new totals were reported showing a decrement.
...At the end, I believe what was said about adjudicated ballots destroying the original ballot is just plain wrong. Maybe it destroys the electronic image of the original ballot within the Dominion system, but I have read before that both images are saved when a ballot is adjudicated.,..
where did you read that????the original ballot is not destroyed? where are they stored and how are they marked? were they counted in the audit?
It going to be cool to watch the GOP implode. I am going to love it.
With all that said though I refuse to claim fraud proven when fraud has not been proven. I’m not going to do it. Show me something better than that 22 minute video and maybe I will go to DC after voting. But, and this is for the Georgia vote which I have followed intently and invested many hours in, I have not seen anything that I doubt more than the result. That is pretty pitiful but true. The Senate runoff will tell me a lot about the state of Georgia at this point.
________________________________________
Good points...
Some FR posters are so determined to have President Trump in office for four more years...Sometimes they are willing to believe anything...
I just hope that two GOP senators win the run-off...
Joe Biden will get many things done with Senate controlled by Schumer...Many things which will be bad for America...
I do admire the sense of loyalty, to Trump, shown by many FR posters...But...
A true patriot. /s
One way might be to count all the paper ballots (the evidence trail of the intent of the voter) by hand and catch them red handed. Right? Well, in Georgia, that is exactly what we did.
https://livestream.com/accounts/26021522/events/8730585/videos/215443723
In the first testimony, a Georgia election official describes how certification of recount in her county and others did not reflect the differences between initial counts and constantly varying results with additional recounts.
The software allows poll workers to dump ‘for adjudication’ ballots into a file, then move that file to the biden column as if the ballots were adjudicated. THAT IS SO OBVIOUS a fraud that a truthful recount woul dhave exposed it, so the SoS of eorgia rigged the recount. THAT IS SWEDITION and deserves life in prison of a noose. Counterfeit ballots were run through the counting machines after the observers were run out of the rooms. THAT IS FRAUD deserving prison terms. ALL of these fraudulent occurances shoul void the whole election and necessitate a new election using paper ballots and hand counting by the military.