Sorry to be so late to the discussion of tolerance. I think it is really a matter of semantics and definition. The “ tolerance” of deviance you see appears to be “allowing” for political gain to me. The liberals don’t extend the same “tolerance” to conservatives who happen to be gay.
If the liberals ever gain full control, those sexual deviants not a part of the elites will be destroyed just like the media that puts the elite in power will be.
The media and the perverted are just a commodity to be used to destroy society and then discarded by liberals. So they appear to tolerate to use them. I see that as “allowing” not true tolerance.
“The media and the perverted are just a commodity to be used to destroy society and then discarded by liberals.”
This is one thing I will never, ever understand about the left. Virtually all of the purple hairs, sexually confused, college professors, most actors (some are needed for propaganda) and minorities will be among the first to “disappear” if the communists ever win.
Each and every single communist revolution makes it pretty frigging clear that the elite needs a useful idiot class of people to get the ball rolling. These people are worthless to communists once they seize power. They have absolutely no skills to contribute to society.
These morons basically sign a death warrant when they participate in these stupid reindeer games contingent upon *winning*, not losing, but winning their stupid, destructive revolution! The very hope-n-change they cheer for involves snuffing them out the minute they *win*. That is ridiculously idiotic to anyone with a functioning brain.
These freaks think that they’ll be leading the gangs that will round up and execute the right. It won’t work that way. If anything, we on the right will have guns to our heads to produce after a period of massive demoralization after all of the “dead weight” is killed off.
I, personally, would rather be dead than living on my knees under the order of some pimple prick pinko, but I find it ironic that I have a better chance at surviving any purges initiated by leftists than your run of the mill, trust fund Marxist out there on the streets, waving their Antifa flags and wearing the opposite sex’s underwear.
AH, I see you did get the summary.
I disagree with one point, leftists/liberals are totally intertwined with all manner of hideous sexual perversion. It’s part of who they are.
Adam Schiff
@RepAdamSchiff
Trump’s contempt for democracy is laid bare. Once again. On tape.
Pressuring an election official to “find” the votes so he can win is potentially criminal,
And another flagrant abuse of power by a corrupt man who would be a despot, if we allowed him.
We will not.
https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1345807237256626176
sliding - I just noticed again the terrible keywords other freepers award to us -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0bidenwillnvrbpotus; 0nothingwillstop; 1whatscoming; 2abidenpresidency; 2manybidenloversonf; 2nobidenpresidency; 4thegullibles; believeanythingcrowd; bidenwilllose; chinaisq; chinapsyop; cluckinghens; comedycentral; dutrollsonfr; fakeelection; fakefreepers; fakepresidentelect; freepers4biden; freepertds; holdmuhserver; itstwuitstwu; keywordtrolls; linwoodisq; lunatics; maga; nobidenpresidency; psyopallalong; q; qanon; qglows; qisevil; qisthebluepill; qodemonkeyz; qooks; sorosoperation; stopthesteal; stormfizzled; tds; trump; trumpwillwinagain; trustjimwatkins; vanity; wedonthaveitall; yesall4alarp;
“The media and the perverted are just a commodity to be used to destroy society and then discarded by liberals. So they appear to tolerate to use them. I see that as “allowing” not true tolerance.”
I’m not discussing how liberals tend to be tolerant. I’m talking about the meaning of the word itself. Like “I’m very liberal in showering my children with affection.” and not “Because I’m a liberal (which I’m not), I shower my children with affection.”.