Posted on 01/01/2021 7:38:33 PM PST by ransomnote
Language, please.
gisd O
Perdue explained it. He can’t be a Senator until he wins the runoff.
Jamie Von - conspiracytheorist wrote:
“This am I listened to Dr. Jeffress’s sermon at First Baptist Dallas on the importance of Christians belonging to a church and attending church in person.
Near the beginning he said the election would be settled (either on or by) January 17th.”
ThankQ for this info; prayers UP !!!
a request needs to be prepared for a no answer.
seems you didn’t. Which, it seems to me, your request is really an order or demand.
Your opinion on my attitude doesn’t interest me. I give two-spits what you think about me.
And I give 4-spits what you think of yourself.
FreeRegards...
Got it... thanks!
I thought you might have meant Barry and Big Mike.
The wheat and the tares will grow together until the time of the great harvest.
on the full POTUS tape, he said, “Look, we have a new tape that no one has ever seen..”
and mentioned that they’re going to show a tape on Monday...
This procedure supersedes the Constitutional remedy, follows the practice of 1876. Instead of the VP ruling on election integrity on the Constitutionality stated day, with the the various state legislatures confirming their determinations, a 'panel' of 5 from the House, 5 from the Senate and 5 from SCOTUS, will consider evidence for 10 days and release a report with their recommendations. Who picks the panel members; who determines what evidentiary material they consider, does their recommendations have to be followed?
This may explain why Congressman Louis Gomert attempted a law suit to force the VP to follow the Constitutional practice with a quick and certain outcome. Thomas Jefferson did this and became President Thomas Jefferson. No one in D.C. with that kind of courage today.
This panel procedure of 10 days (to consider the veracity of thousands of pages of evidentiary material) would ostensibly leave 4 days to inauguration for the Congress to decide who POTUS will be. 😴
Tom “Sack-o-S***” Cotton’s statement.
https://www.cotton.senate.gov/news/press-releases/cotton-statement-on-joint-session-of-congress-
JANUARY 03, 2021
COTTON STATEMENT ON JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Caroline Tabler or James Arnold (202) 734-0430
January 3, 2021
Cotton Statement on Joint Session of Congress
Washington, D.C. — Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) released the following statement on the joint session of Congress later this week:
“I share the concerns of many Arkansans about irregularities in the presidential election, especially in states that rushed through election-law changes to relax standards for voting-by-mail. I also share their disappointment with the election results. I therefore support a commission to study the last election and propose reforms to protect the integrity of our elections. And after Republicans win in Georgia, the Senate should also hold more hearings on these matters. All Americans deserve to have confidence in the elections that undergird our free government.
Nevertheless, the Founders entrusted our elections chiefly to the states—not Congress. They entrusted the election of our president to the people, acting through the Electoral College—not Congress. And they entrusted the adjudication of election disputes to the courts—not Congress. Under the Constitution and federal law, Congress’s power is limited to counting electoral votes submitted by the states.
If Congress purported to overturn the results of the Electoral College, it would not only exceed that power, but also establish unwise precedents. First, Congress would take away the power to choose the president from the people, which would essentially end presidential elections and place that power in the hands of whichever party controls Congress. Second, Congress would imperil the Electoral College, which gives small states like Arkansas a voice in presidential elections. Democrats could achieve their longstanding goal of eliminating the Electoral College in effect by refusing to count electoral votes in the future for a Republican president-elect. Third, Congress would take another big step toward federalizing election law, another longstanding Democratic priority that Republicans have consistently opposed.
Thus, I will not oppose the counting of certified electoral votes on January 6. I’m grateful for what the president accomplished over the past four years, which is why I campaigned vigorously for his reelection. But objecting to certified electoral votes won’t give him a second term—it will only embolden those Democrats who want to erode further our system of constitutional government.”
Won a tough race. Seems to be the real deal
I’m guessing we find out Wednesday.
Or, should we believe there was nothing? LOL, I don’t think so...
But it’s clear that there is some cards to be placed on the table. The next few days should be a mind blower.
But I’ll admit this. I’m sick of defense, I wanna see offense...PAIN. There’s no point in holding power if you don’t plan on using it, and we know the left if they take power, will they ever use it on us.
I have heard nothing about Ratcliffe’s report. Of course the report was given to POTUS, the SoD, the SoS and the SoT. Not to the public. So we don’t know what happened.
Another one for the list ... Rep. Brian Mast (R Fla)
https://twitter.com/RepBrianMast/status/1345770555488808961
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.