Is the WSJ’s Editorial Board corrupt? This piece is pathetic. It’s focused on the technical aspects of overturning the election and doesn’t discuss the motivation for doing so. Can the Board explain Pennsylvania’s 3am vote spikes? That would be helpful. Didn’t want to mention the slippery slope of a months long election with reporting of results, easy access to ballots, USPS being used for a polling station while they endorsed Biden and can’t deliver mail consistently, and an election decision delivered after the polls closed (”Chicago Style”), which at a minimum enables the potential appearance of fraud let alone massive fraud? That would be actually helpful instead of avoiding the real issues while creating a piece seemingly stoking their egos.
Add in the WSJ’s avoidance of the possible Hunder Biden hard drive issue and maybe we see their real intentions.
The WSJ Editors claim that the Trump lost to a surge in “suburban vote” and not in the cities. Here for a Bloomberg article promoting the claim that comes form its “City Lab,” whatever that is: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-suburban-density-election/
The premise is based upon “Democratic gains” from 2016 and only on the Presidential race, not entire tickets, so stop right there. 2016 is a stupid benchmark for comparison and this “study” builds in the fraud.
I’d love to see someone else’s analysis of this lie, as it has become the justification of the political class for ignoring plain theft.