My thoughts on the Potential Impact of Amendment V After Denial of Due Process with Respect to a Presidential Election

12/31/2020 | Brian Griffin

[Brian Griffin]

Amendment V clearly states that “No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...”

Decades of illegal immigration, resulting anchor babies now of voting age, and further election fraud and malfeasance executed with the connivance of judges, elected public officials and slyly corrupt ballot handlers, even if it was undoubtedly not significant enough to hand the presidency to Biden, was undoubtedly a deeeply disturbing denial of the due process of law threatening to unleash a civil war.

Millions of Americans strongly feel that vote counts ought to have been adjusted to offset election fraud and malfeasance, but courts have refused to apply offset remedies. We are now sadly at the time point when defects in popular vote appointment of state electors probably can not be directly corrected by the courts.

Aggrieved Americans must look and petition for another type of judicial remedy for the repeated and compounded denial of 2020 election-related Amendment V due process.

I suggest that such a remedy might take the form of a federal court injunction to prevent laws being signed into law during the first four years of a Biden presidency from taking “life, liberty, or property”, at least if they were not passed by veto-proof majorities of Congress.

This federal court injunction should block the federal enactment of any new tax, including any new tax on guns or ammo, any new federal law punitive measure (including those related to mask-wearing even when solely to be enforced by financially co-opted states) and any significantly large federal debt ceiling increase which must inevitably result in property deprivation impacting at least one person.

The injunction should further run indefinitely (or at least until the next time a Republican president takes office) if naturalization not approved by veto-proof majorities of Congress after a Biden inauguration would further extend the impact of denial of due process with respect to the 2020 presidential election.

[Jane Long]

It’s all a moot point if PDJT isn’t inaugurated on Jan 20, 2021.

[Intolerant in NJ]

Everyone in this country who voted for Trump, whether their vote was actually registered for him or not, was disenfranchised by the stolen election - too bad the Supreme Court was too cowardly to acknowledge the fact....