[JudyinCanada]

I have wondered if Lin is actually trolling on behalf of the president. He’s putting so much dirt out there. Meadows, CJ Roberts, Crenshaw.....yikes. Pretty bold stuff for a defamation lawyer.

He’s either quite a nut, or he’s serving a purpose.

[Dr. Franklin]

I have wondered if Lin is actually trolling on behalf of the president. He's putting so much dirt out there. Meadows, CJ Roberts, Crenshaw.....yikes. Pretty bold stuff for a defamation lawyer. He's either quite a nut, or he's serving a purpose.

My conclusion is that Wood is getting intelligence from someone in Trump's inner circle and trolling CJ Roberts with it. Some of it may be from illegal wire taps by foreign intelligence agencies. Wood, being a defamation attorney knows how to use it effectively because it normally can't be used in court. However, a libel case about a "public figure" requires proof "actual malice" to succeed. So, even if Wood has something that normally isn't admissible in court, it could be admissible to prove a lack of malice on his part. That may be his trap for Roberts.

The allegations of homosexual child prostitution involving the Bushes have been around since the late 80's:
https://www.educate-yourself.org/tg/franklincoverupexcerptwashtimesphoto.shtml
https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/Franklin/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm
In addition to this being used to blackmail closeted homosexuals in a less tolerant age, I also remember allegations that important guests were invited to a party, drugged, and then photographed in compromising positions. People didn't cross the Bushes.

With regard to Roberts and the illegal adoption of children, The U.S. ratified the Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption on December 12, 2007. That expanded the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction which the U.S. also ratified. An illegal adoption would violate that treaty, which is the supreme law of the land. It makes no difference that the children weren't U.S. citizens. However, as far as I can discern, the U.S., at present, doesn't recognize illegal adoptions as human trafficking at present. If someone in the administration wanted to change that interpretation, I suspect it could be done.