[bagster]

It was never going to be an easy task proving the voter fraud that obviously took place in the short time between election day and Inauguration Day

Weird how you say its obvious. Seems its already proved to your satisfaction. Mine too.

Just a matter of getting in front of a compromised judiciary. And there was plenty of time for that. Its not about time.

I despise James Baker, but he was ruthless and methodical in heading up Bush's post-election fights in the 2000 election

The difference between then and now is, then Baker and Bush were inside the derp state.

Now, Trump and his people are complete outsiders and enemies of the derp state. They are patriots and derps hate patriots.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

Weird how you say its obvious. Seems its already proved to your satisfaction. Mine too.

Just a matter of getting in front of a compromised judiciary.

The judiciary is not going to accept statistical improbabilities as proof. I do - I know how ridiculously unlikely it is that one candidate could get 99.6% of the vote from a vote dump. I'm convinced that Trump was defrauded. But a judge will not accept that as proof.

Finding real evidence of the fraud and making a case that would cause judges to invalidate the results in two months was always going to be very difficult. Proving it would take a team of investigators and lawyers far more competent than the ones Trump unfortunately has working in his cause right now.