I said “strong histories” of supporting the deep state narrative.
In other words, they’ve been observed doing the same thing on a consistent basis on this website over a long period of time.
In this thread, they piled on en masse saying they couldn’t see the smoke so it wasn’t true. Others said it wasn’t true just because they felt like it.
Doesn’t take a genius to see when careful consideration is used and when it isn’t.
First, E.P. Unum changed the title to support their claim, and that's poor netiquette. The source did not claim a missile strike.
Some of us pointed out the smoke, steam, or whatever it was was going up, after the blast, not coming down before the blast. In the video posted, the announcer says it is going up, then the smoke cloud appears. That view is block by buildings so we never saw the explosion, only the cloud of debris afterwards. In the Natural News video in post #56 they said the flash occurred first, then the stream of smoke going up, then the smoke cloud. None of the videos posted claimed a missile strike, and what was said on the videos contradicts the claims of a missile strike.
Missile motors for anti tank weapons and man portable surface to air missiles only burn for a few seconds, and do not power the weapon continuously to target. Most of their flight is on inertia. The most likely missile would be a anti tank weapon like a Hellfire, which is 7" diameter, 5'4" long, and flies around Mach 1.14. It is extremely unlikely that its motor will still be burning and leaving a exhaust trail when it hits, or that it would be visible in flight as it flew to its target in the early morning.
After the announcement to evacuate because the RV was going to explode, there were lots of very excited and alert people interested in the RV, in and outside of its immediate vicinity. None of them reported a missile strike.
Any missile would have to be launched from somewhere, and guided to hit a RV on a street between buildings. No one reported a ground or air launch.