You’re wrong, my Freeper friend.
Political support for Trump, like any political belief system, can be real or fake.
The best time to test for fakery is when the political winds are blowing fiercely in the opposite direction. (In the current circumstances, the opposite direction means against Trump.)
The political wiseguys like Buchanan can and do make use of language to hide their fakery. But this is War. And in war things are black and white. No hiding place for subtlety; no refuge for nuance.
Anyone who hints that Trump might not win this war is not on Trump’s side.
The only question is: what motivates Buchanan’s anti-Trump core? Is it possible he took money from the enemy?
Bookmark
“Anyone who hints that Trump might not win this war is not on Trump’s side.”
So, just to be clear: As one who is on Trump’s side, you’re saying there’s NO chance he won’t win this war - that his victory is a certainty?
“Anyone who hints that Trump might not win this war is not on Trump’s side.”
Strange and contradictory language coming from someone who uses ‘reason’ as part of his name.
I’m so sick of jackasses listening to their own onanism.
Buchanan’s article explains that Trump and his supporters are likely to control the party and win in the near future.
But you’re crowing about nonsense, I doubt you read the article.
Now people can’t discuss whether Trump will win because that indicates he might lose?
Grow up.
People discuss things and we’ll never win with annoying blowhards like you.
Merry Christmas.