I just looked through the whole “binder” - nothing there that hasn’t already been seen here ... including the 2018 EO.
Couldn’t disagree with that much, maybe it’s intended for a less informed
audience. Anyhow I was looking for something off page 221 article cited the
Antrim County report by the Allied Security Operations Group.
Antrim County Forensic Report Shows Manipulation of Votes
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/12/14/antrim-county-forensic-report-shows-manipulation-of-votes/
Ramsland’s team also confirms that the DVS machine errors are not glitches but, rather, the machines and software are designed to create fraud and affect election results:
“The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors.
The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors
lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no
audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.”
Based on the study, the group concluded that the machines should not be used in Michigan nor should the election results in Antrim County be certified.
The team of seven investigators spent eight hours on Dec. 6 performing a forensic
audit on the machines. The findings seem to be both damning and significant. One
such finding focused on error rates that demonstrated a “significant and fatal error
in security and election integrity.”
The “allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission
guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008 percent).” The team, however, observed
an “error rate of 68.05 percent.
This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.”
The team makes it clear that the errors were due to machine not human error as
Jocelyn Benson said in early November.”