Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gwjack

I’m dubious on whether the VP really has this authority. I think if he does this, it’ll end up in SOCTUS, which is fine.

But as you say:

> “There is no reason that he would publicly disclose his communication.”

Yea, we may not find out that he did this until SoS’ in the states in question start throwing fits. If he’s literally just mailing these notices via certified mail and staying quiet, they probably won’t be received until after Christmas.


32 posted on 12/23/2020 12:39:14 PM PST by shaven_llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: shaven_llama

I am undecided whether VP has the responsibility/authority. It is a legislative effort to make the 12th Amendment clear, and add a few more steps. Both seem to be gobbledygook, and incomplete. Especially the statutes which assume intent of the Amenders in 1804. As for SCOTUS deciding, I saw that posited. On the serious side, I wonder who would have standing to file with SCOTUS. Most SOSs are Republican. The states legislatures are all Republican. It would seem to me that any Democrat would not have standing as a party or individual. As I told my younger brother a few weeks ago, the death knell in the election will not be delivered by SCOTUS, but by RINOs. The Senate Majority Leader is already discouraging other colleagues from protesting.

We will know in two weeks how it will play out. Maybe.

Gwjack

P.S. I hope you have a Merry Christmas.


46 posted on 12/23/2020 1:49:49 PM PST by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson