[Dr. Franklin]

There’s no ‘Napoleonic Code’ issue here. Obviously! How can anyone equate a straight reading of the Constitution to civic law is unfathomable LOL! Just whether the Constitution means what it says or not. You say “not”. (Which, like “shall” and “all” hasn’t changed in meaning since our Founding.)

The Constitution makes clear that VPOTUS presides over the entire process of collecting and counting the votes. By statute, objections to his actions must be in writing, so no scenes from Crazy Nancy at the rostrum to what he does. So according to you, anyone can send a fake slate of electors to VPOTUS and each and everyone must be presented for a vote, even if written with crayon? No serious person would agree with that. Pelose could move to impeach VPOTUS for that, and it would be a badge of honor for saving the Republic.

[mrsmith]

"So according to you the Constititution, anyone can send a fake slate of electors to VPOTUS and each and everyone must be presented for a vote, even if written with crayon?

LOL! You have NO ability to argue a point! Sure, it's easy to distract idiots, but it never works with those who aren't idiots.

"Shall"... "ALL"..., words even idiots can understand. So who are you appealing to- since even idiots know better?